Analysis of Open Access Latin American journal ́s The case Ecuador | Revista Publicando
Analysis of Open Access Latin American journal ́s The case Ecuador
PDF (ES)

Keywords

DOAJ
Google Académico
Minería de Textos
revistas ecuatorianas DOAJ
Google Scholar
Text Mining
Ecuadorian journals

How to Cite

González Alonso, J. A., & Pérez González, Y. (2015). Analysis of Open Access Latin American journal ́s The case Ecuador . Revista Publicando, 2(2), 12-23. Retrieved from https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/30

Abstract

From the records of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) 19 countries with a total of 851 were selected. For these countries five major groups could be considered, which greater number of journal to fewer are:

a) Colombia b) Chile, Argentina c) Cuba, Venezuela d) Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru e) The remaining countries

An analysis in Google Scholar was performed for the 7 Ecuadorian journals registered in DOAJ and indicates that bibliometric indicators in relation to total citations received still remain low. “Iconos” magazine with an h index of 12 and a g index of 19 ranks it as the Ecuadorian open access journal with greatest impact. Text Mining procedures for analyzing the frequency of words in the titles of the 451 articles in Ecuadorian journals were applied indicating that a significant percentage of them are based on reviews of social issues, which is explained by the fact that most of these magazines are those disciplines. The study points the need to continue using Text Mining procedures in the research conducted for all open access journals in Latin America.

PDF (ES)

References

Babini, D. (2011). Acceso Abierto a La Producción Cientí­fica De América Latina Y El Caribe: Identificación De Principales Instituciones Para Estrategias De Integración Regional (Open Access to Scientific Output from Latin America and the Caribbean: Identification of Main Institutions for Regional Integration Strategies). Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnologí­a y Sociedad CTS, 6(17).

Babini, D., De-Volder, C., & López, F.-A. (2013). El acceso abierto: un desafí­o para las 7universidades.

Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC medicine, 10(1), 73.

Burns, C. S. (2013). Google Scholar and free or open access scholarly content: impact on academic libraries.

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.

Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6).

Harzing, A.-W. (2014). Harzing.com. Publish or Perish Retrieved 22 de Junio, 2014, from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm?source=pop_4.6.4.5271

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output Retrieved 30 de Mayo, 2014, from http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508025v5

Melero, P. R. (2005). Artí­culo: Acceso abierto a las publicaciones cientí­ficas: definición, recursos, copyright e impacto. El profesional de la información, 14(4), 255-266.

Rapidminer. (2014). Products. RapidMiner Studio Retrieved 8 Enero, 2014, from http://rapidminer.com/products/rapidminer-studio/

Robinson-Garcí­a, N., Delgado López-Cózar, E., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2011). Cómo comunicar y diseminar información cientí­fica en Internet para obtener mayor visibilidad e impacto.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jorge Alberto González Alonso, Yudeisy Pérez González

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.