Andragogical Focus to enhance Reading skills in University students | Revista Publicando
Andragogical Focus to enhance Reading skills in University students
Ver PDF

Palabras clave

Cobit 5
Gobierno TI
modelo de Capacidad de procesos
enfoque Fuzzy
enfoque Multicriterio

Cómo citar

Hidalgo Camacho, C., & Villací­s Villací­s, W. (2017). Andragogical Focus to enhance Reading skills in University students. Revista Publicando, 4(12 (1), 351-360. Recuperado a partir de https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/665

Resumen

Reading can definitely be affected by some personal factors such as formal educational background, frequency of reading, types of texts used, attitude of the reader, among others. However, it still has to be integrated to daily classes, especially when learning a new language. This research work aimed to enhance reading comprehension in intermediate level students of English as a foreign language in the 18-40 age group, at the Languages Center - Universidad Técnica De Ambato.

Teaching reading strategies with a focus on andragogy to university students is valuable because while being appreciated as adults, they can participate and co-exist in work groups where their learning will evolve through sharing experiences with their peers and their teacher.

Two groups were observed: one experimental and one controlled. The instruments used in this research allowed us to measure the effect and importance of using class-time with the use of tools and reading strategies with the above mentioned focus. Finally, this type of analysis allowed us to conclude that after intervention, the experimental group obtained better results in reading comprehension tests, applying the andragogical approach; therefore it can be stated that this was found to be effective, therefore applicable in the future.

Ver PDF

Citas

(05 de 08 de 2016). Obtenido de Teacher Pages: http://teacherpages.nhcs.net/schools/parsley/karlysokolowski/Documents/Reading Comprehension/Barrett's%20Taxonomy%20of%20Reading%20Co

Adam, F. (1977). Andragogí­a. Ciencia de la Educación de Adultos. Publicaciones de la PResidencia-2da Edición. Caracas, Veezuela: Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodrí­guez.

Bastidas, I. (MArzo de 2010). Elaboración de una guí­a de estrategias, tendiente al aprendizaje autónomo, para la comprensión de lectura de textos auténticos del internet y redacción subsiguiente, dirigida a los estudiantes de los niveles v y vi de inglés de LEAI de la PUCE. Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador .

Blondy, L. (2007). Evaluation and Application of Andragogical Assumptions to the . Journal of interactive Online Learning, 116-130.

Carney, T. H. (1992). La Enseñanza de la Comprensión Lectora. Madrid: Editorial Morata.

Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE Journal, 137-159.

Chamensky, B. (2016). Andragogy and Classic Grounded Theory: Hidden. Advances in Research.

Clymer, T. (1968). Current Conceptions of Reading”, Innovations and Change in Reading Instruction, . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dubois, M. (1989). Las teorí­as sobre lectura y la educación superior”. LEctura y Vida, 5-7.

Glaser, R. (1973). The new aptitudes and adaptive education. Antropology and Education, 20-26.

Knowles, M. (1973). The Adult Learner: A neglected species. American Society for training and development.

Knowles, M. (1980). The modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago: Follett.

Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Knowles, M. S, Holton III, E., & Swanson, R. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. . Routledge.

Lara dos Santos, P. (2007). Cooperative Learnings: Andragogy. Academia.

Merriam, S. (2001). The new Update on adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education no89.

INEC. (Octubre). Recuperado el 14 de Mayo de 2015, de http://www.inec.gob.ec/documentos_varios/presentacion_habitos.pdf

Ozuah, P. O. (2016). First, there was pedagogy and then came andragogy. Einstein journal of Biology and Medicine,, 21(2), 83-87.

Park, Sunyoung, Robinson, Petra, & Bates, Reid . (2016). Adult Learning Principles and Processes and TheirRelationships with Learner Satisfaction: Validationof the Andragogy in Practice Inventory (API) in the Jordanian Context. Adult Education Research Conference (págs. 179-185).

Charlotte, NC: New Prairie Press.

Phillips , L., Baltzer, C., Filoon, L., & Whitley, C. (2017). Adult student preferences: Instructor characteristics conducive to successful teaching. Journal or Adult and continuing education, 49-60.

Piaget, J. (1958). Principal factors determining intellectual evolution from childhood to adult life. New York, Crowell: E.L Hartley and R.E. Hartley .

Smith, M. (2004). Eduard Lindeman and the meaning of Adult Education. Obtenido de The encyclopaedia of Informal Education: http://www.infed.org/thinkers/rtt-lind.htm

Sole, I. (1992). Estrategias de lectura. Barcelona: Grao.

Sole, I. (1996). Estrategias de comprensión de la lectura. Barcelona: Grao.

St. Clair, R. (2002). Andragogy revisisted. Theory for the 21st Century? Myths and Realities. Eric Publications.

Walter, C. (2004). Reading in a second Language. LLAS.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.