RPPH Blog Books / Libros
Representation of the Punishment Concept by the Legal Terms Punishment, Penalty and their Derivatives
PDF (Inglés)

Palabras clave

strategic management of quality
Building trust
financial performance
the Melli Bank of Ardabil Province

Cómo citar

Danilov, K., Varshamova, N. L., & Yashina, E. V. (2018). Representation of the Punishment Concept by the Legal Terms Punishment, Penalty and their Derivatives. Revista Publicando, 5(15(2), 100-123. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/1210

Resumen

This paper covers the peculiarities of the PUNISHMENT concept in the minds of American and British lawyers. The authors have found the basic constituents of the concept and determined its correlations with other legal and everyday concepts. Since the PUNISHMENT concept has been viewed as the element of legal thinking and reasoning in the two countries, the differences, stemming from this fact, have also been noted. The materials for the analysis are the definitions from law dictionaries and the texts of works on legal issues both physical and online. The paper might be useful to law students and all the people who are interested in the professional legal attitude to crime and punishment in Britain and the US.    

PDF (Inglés)

Referencias

Bedau, H.A. (1986). Capital Punishment, Matters of Life and Death. New Introductory Essays in Moral Philosophy, Raleigh: McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 186.

Burnham, W. (1995). Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co. 312.

Cambridge International Dictionary of English, (1995). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1044, 1147.

Death Penalty Information Center (a), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty (access date: 02/25/18).

Death Penalty Information Center (b), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/views-executions (access date: 02/25/18).

Death Penalty Information Center (c), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/women-and-death-penalty (access date: 02/25/18).

Dictionary of Law. (1995). Teddington: Peter Collin Publishing 15, 33, 66, 175, 194.

Fillmore, Ch., Atkins B. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its neighbours. Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization / Edd by Adrienne Lehrer, Eva Feder Kittey. – Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, inc., Publishers, pp. 75-103.

Garner, B. A. (2001). A dictionary of modern legal usage, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 259, 718.

Jackendoff, Ray S. (1999). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 283 p.

Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 614.

Law Dictionary // http://dictionary.law.com (access date: 02/25/18).

McKendrick, E. (2000). Contract Law. N.Y.: Palgrave. 6-7.

The Lectric Law Library // www.lectlaw.com/def.htm (access date: 02/25/18).

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. (1998). V. 8, St. Paul, MN: West Group. 234.

Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia

Bajo los siguientes términos:

Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.

NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.

CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la lamisma licencia del original.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.