Abstract
This paper covers the peculiarities of the PUNISHMENT concept in the minds of American and British lawyers. The authors have found the basic constituents of the concept and determined its correlations with other legal and everyday concepts. Since the PUNISHMENT concept has been viewed as the element of legal thinking and reasoning in the two countries, the differences, stemming from this fact, have also been noted. The materials for the analysis are the definitions from law dictionaries and the texts of works on legal issues both physical and online. The paper might be useful to law students and all the people who are interested in the professional legal attitude to crime and punishment in Britain and the US.
References
Bedau, H.A. (1986). Capital Punishment, Matters of Life and Death. New Introductory Essays in Moral Philosophy, Raleigh: McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 186.
Burnham, W. (1995). Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co. 312.
Cambridge International Dictionary of English, (1995). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1044, 1147.
Death Penalty Information Center (a), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty (access date: 02/25/18).
Death Penalty Information Center (b), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/views-executions (access date: 02/25/18).
Death Penalty Information Center (c), // https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/women-and-death-penalty (access date: 02/25/18).
Dictionary of Law. (1995). Teddington: Peter Collin Publishing 15, 33, 66, 175, 194.
Fillmore, Ch., Atkins B. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its neighbours. Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization / Edd by Adrienne Lehrer, Eva Feder Kittey. – Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, inc., Publishers, pp. 75-103.
Garner, B. A. (2001). A dictionary of modern legal usage, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 259, 718.
Jackendoff, Ray S. (1999). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 283 p.
Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 614.
Law Dictionary // http://dictionary.law.com (access date: 02/25/18).
McKendrick, E. (2000). Contract Law. N.Y.: Palgrave. 6-7.
The Lectric Law Library // www.lectlaw.com/def.htm (access date: 02/25/18).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. (1998). V. 8, St. Paul, MN: West Group. 234.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.