The Incident In Forming Adultery Motif In The Artistic Structure Of The Novel “Anna Karenina” By Leo Tolstoy | Revista Publicando
The Incident In Forming Adultery Motif In The Artistic Structure Of The Novel “Anna Karenina” By Leo Tolstoy
PDF (EN)

Palabras clave

Prescripción
Estrategia AIEPI
Infecciones respiratorias altas
Experimentos médicos

Cómo citar

Zakirov, A., Sayapova, A., & Andryushchenko, O. (2017). The Incident In Forming Adultery Motif In The Artistic Structure Of The Novel “Anna Karenina” By Leo Tolstoy. Revista Publicando, 4(13 (2), 894-903. Recuperado a partir de https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/951

Resumen

This article examines the series of events in the artistic structure of the novel "Anna Karenina" by Leo Tolstoy in the context of the concept of case, which, as the basic symbol, becomes the focus of the semantic content of the novel. Separate episodes with casual events line up in structural episodes of storylines of the Tolstoy”™s work. The symbolic concentration of the semantic content of case receives its transcription in cumulatively built episodes. The semantic content of the symbolically interpreted image of case in a number of random events is represented by the Russian thinker of the nineteenth century Leo Tolstoy as something that leads to disruption of the primordial order in Russian life, and this way case appears to be the historical grain of the novel”™s narrative storytelling. Casual, as Leo Tolstoy understands it, becomes inevitable fatal force of destiny. The results of casual confront the reasonable necessity accumulated by age-old traditions. This casual as an event determines almost the entire series of events of the novel as a part of the plot. The basic plot situation of  Tolstoy”™s novel is reduced to the confrontation of reasonable necessity as the form of existence within the family to what is generated by the age of enframing (M. Heidegger).

PDF (EN)

Citas

Gubaidullina A. N. 2016.Case and event in modern Siberian poetry for children (A. Bergelson, A. Olear, N. Yaroslavets, A. Eroshin) // child read. – St. Petersburg: Institute of Russian literature (Pushkin house), â„– 2 (010). – P. 304-316.

Hegel, G. W. F. 1977: Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press (originally published 1807), 640 p.

Heidegger, M. 1973. Art and Space: Man and the Word: An International Philosophical Review 6 (1), pp: 3-8.

Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York, pp: 487.

Heidegger, M. 1978. Letter on Humanism. In: D. F. Krell, ed. Basic Writings. London: Routledge, pp: 213-265.

Khrabrova A. V. 2016."Suddenly is a discovery": the category of chance in the creative system late early Lermontov and Dostoevsky // Siberian philological journal. – Novosibirsk: Institute of Philology, Siberian branch of RAS, No. 2. – P. 16-20.

Literature and literary theory. 2004.In two volumes. Ed. D. Tamarchenko. Volume 1 / study guide. – M.: Academy, 512 p.

Lotman Y. 1996.M. Inside minded worlds. Man – Text – universe of the mind – history. – Moscow: Languages of Russian culture, 448 p.

Sayapova A. M., Amurskaya O. Y. 2015. Symbolic Interpretation of the Image of Geothe''s Faust in the Context of Heidegger''s Notions of "The Earth" and "The Sky": Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6, No 6 S5, pp. 43-49.

Tomashevsky B. 1996.Theory of literature. Poetics: Proc. Handbook – M.: Aspect Press, 334 p.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.