Keywords
control disciplinario
intromisión en la justicia
Consejo de la Judicatura
How to Cite
Abstract
Fixed comparisons are of particular importance in the phraseological system of any language. They can reveal the specifics of vision of the world of a particular nation, presenting a system of assessments being characteristic of a particular culture. Comparative analysis of set comparisons takes one of the leading positions among the numerous aspects of comparative phraseology, which emphasizes the relevance of the study.
The work in this vein makes it possible to explain the reason for choosing models of comparison, as well as the features of the development of fixed comparisons of a particular language.
This article presents a contrastive analysis of set comparisons in Russian and Swedish based on the story “The Magician”™s Hat” by Tove Jansson. The authors compared the original text of the works with two translations made by L.Y. Braude and V.A. Smirnov, and came to the conclusion that in the Russian variant, set comparative expressions are used much more often. In the process of translation, not only Russian fixed comparisons to be equivalent to Swedish set comparisons were successfully chosen, but the author”™s individual comparative constructions of the Swedish-language original text were in most cases rendered by set comparisons in Russian that are close in meaning. A large number of set comparisons gives the text expressiveness, without making it heavier, but making it easier for understanding, since set comparisons do not require explanations, they are fixed in the minds of native speakers.
References
Arsentyeva E.F, Kayumova A.R. 2014. Complex modifications of phraseological units and the ways of their translation. – Life Sci. J. – Vol.11. No.6 .pp. 502-506.
Fernando C.1996. Idioms and Idiomaticity .Oxford. UniversityPress.256 pp.
Gafiyatova E.V., Samarkina N.O., Shelestova O.V. 2016.Phytonyms in the Tatar and English languages: comparative analysis. – Journal of Language and Literature. – Vol. 7. No. 2. pp.146-149.
Gibbs R.W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. CambridgeUniversityPress.527 pp.
JanssonT. 2014. TrollkarlensHatt. Helsingfors. Schildts&Sí¶derstrí¶ms. 156 pp.
Jansson Т. 2004.ShlyapaVolshebnika / TranslatedbySmirnov Ð.V. – Ðœ.: Rosman-Press,86 p.
JanssonТ. 2017.Shlyapa Volshebnika / Translated by Braude L. Y.– Ðœ.: Makhaon, Azbuka-Attikus, 224 p.
Kochemasova D.R., Gizyatova L.A., Zabolotskaya A.R. 2016.The usage of phraseological units when forming lexical competence on the example of the training package opportunities intermediate. – Journal of organizational culture communications and conflict. – Vol. 20, special issue. pp.56-63.
Kunin A.V. 1996. The Course of Phraseology of Modern English. Moscow. Fenix.123 pp.
KuznetsovS.Ð.2003. ModernExplanatoryRussianDictionary. – SP: Norint, 960 p.
KurilovaÐ.D. 2009.New Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language. – Ðœ.: Russkiy Yazyk– Media; Drof,777 p.
LexinURL: lexin.nada.kth.se/lexin/ (assessed: 25.04.2017)
Melerovich A.M., Mokienko V.M. 2001. Phraseologisms in Russian Speech. Russian Dictionaries. Astrel. Moscow. 210 pp.
Mikhelson МихельÑонМ.I.2004. GreatExplanatoryPhraseological dictionary by Mikhelson. SP, 2208 p.
OgoltsevV.Ðœ. 2001.TheDictionaryofSetComparisons of the Russian Language (Synonymous-Antonymous). – Ðœ.: LLC “Izd-vo Astrel”, 2001. – 800p.
Ogoltsev V.Ðœ.1994. Abridged Dictionary of Set Comparisons of the Russian Language. – Izhevsk: UdmurdtUniversityPress. – 204 p.
Subich V.G., Mingazova N.G., Shamsutdinova E.K. Comparative analysis of English, Arabic and Tatar national corpora. – Journal of Language and Literature. – Vol. 7. No. 2. – 2016 – pp.150-154.
Svenska Sprí¥kní¤mnden.2011. Svenskt sprí¥kbruk: ordbok í¶ver konstruktioner och fraser. Sprí¥krí¥det.
TeliaV.N. 1996.Russian Phraseology. Semantic, PragmaticandLinguisticandCultural Aspects. – Ðœ.,– 286 p.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.