Keywords
Design
content and Safavid Iran
How to Cite
Abstract
The theory of value-work, since its postulation in classical theories (Smith: 1776, Ricardo: 1817) has been an object of study of constant debate in society. This article intends to review the problem of how the new forms of production also discuss the classical theory of labor value proposed by Karl Marx (1857. A journey is made in its evolution from modernity, conceived as the industrial era, to overmodernity, where a digital age is forged. Through the bibliographic review method of some authors, it is found that despite the Marxist approaches on the difference between value and labor price, the measurement of wealth continues to predominate based on the working time involved. This allows us to raise the hypothesis that society has not been able to differentiate the Marxist postulates of the Ricardians and can observe this confusion when fixing or organizing the weekly work schedule, the age for retirement, the dead time within the company, labor flexibility, among others. However, in the quest to reduce the difference between the actual working time and the legal working time of the proletariat and in becoming a growing social sector its final effect has been a pauperization of the masses of workers.
References
Actis di Pasquale, E., & Atucha, A. J. (2003). Brechas salariales: discriminación o diferencias de productividad. Momento Económico, (126), 23-33.
Auge, M. (1993). Los “no lugares” espacios del anonimato. Una antropología de la sobremodernidad. Barcelona: Gedis.
Bose, A. (1975). Marxian and Post-Marxian Polítical Economy: an introduction. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
Cárdenas-Pérez, A. (2019). Aportes de William Stanley Jevons hacia una interdisciplinariedad entre contabilidad y economía. Prospectivas UTC. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Económicas, 2(1), 113-124.
Couyoumdjian, J. (2015). Importando modernidad: la evolución del pensamiento económico en Chile en el siglo XIX. Historia (Santiago), 48 (1), 43-75. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-71942015000100002
Covarrubias, K. (1996). Reseña de Antropología de la Sobremodernidad de Marc Augé. Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 2(3), 171-172. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31600310
Crozier, M. (1964): El Fenómeno Burocrático. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.
Dobb, M. (1945). Economía política y capitalismo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dobb, M. (1976). Teorías del valor y de la distribución desde Adam Smith. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Grisanti, A. (2014). Responsabilidad del contador público en el ejercicio independiente de su profesión. Actualidad Contable Faces, 17 (29), 18-48.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2018). Ecuador en cifras. Recuperado de http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Poblacion_y_Demografia/Proyecciones_Poblacionales/presentacion.pdf
Lorente, L. (1981). Formulación matemática de la teoría del valor. Cuadernos de economía (Santafé de Bogotá), 1(3), 83-147.
Marx, K. (1975). El capital: Crítica de la economía política. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Marx, K. (1998). Grundrisse: Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de Economía Política (Borrador). México: Editorial Siglo XXI.
Ricardo, D. (1817). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Macmillan.
Smith, A. (1776). Investigación sobre la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones. Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.