Keywords
Evaluación de la Usabilidad
Experiencia de Usuario
Mejora de Procesos
Software
How to Cite
Abstract
The article reviews the leading modern legal systems. Their main features as well as advantages and disadvantages were identified. The article notes the existence of conditions for competition between legal systems, that, eventually, leads to a rapprochement between them on the basic parameters. The Russian law, by its characteristics, is referred to the continental legal family. The analysis of the key directions in the development of economic legislation reveals, at the same time, a tendency to penetrate the Anglo-Saxon legal institutions into the Russian legal system.
References
Peters, A., 2014. The Competition between Legal Orders. International Law Research, 3(1) // https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404377 (accessed 27 January 2018).
Ogus, A., 1999. Competition Between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis To Comparative Law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 48(2): 405-418.
Merryman, J.H., 1985. The Civil Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of West-ern Europe and Latin America. Stanford, p. 5.
Vago, S., 2003. Law and Society. New Jersey, p. 12-18.
Chloros, A.G.,1992. Common Law, Civil Law and Socialist Law: Three leading Systems of the World, Three Kinds of Legal Thought. Comparative Legal Cultures. New York, p. 83 - 97.
Marchenko, M.N. 2001. Comparative jurisprudence. A common part. M., pp. 262. (In Russian).
Liebesny, H., 1981. Foreign Legal Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Wash., p. 2-3;
Vogenauer, S., 2013. Regulatory Competition through Choice of Contract Law and Choice of Forum in Europe: Theory and Evidence. European Review of Private Law,1:13 - 78.
Potapova, A.M., 2008. To develop the international influence of continental law and to resist the expansion of common law. The Bulletin of the Federal Chamber of Attorneys the Russian Federation,3: 69-77. (In Russian).
Lagarde,P., von Hoffmann, B., 2000. The Europeanization of International Private Law. Zeitschrift Privatrecht., 8(1): 173 - 177.
Mirow, M.C., 2004. Latin American Law. A History of Private Law and Institutions in Spanish America. Austin: University of Texas Press, 359 pp.
Zimmerman, R., Visser, D.P., 1996. Civil law and common law in South Africa. Oxford, p. 832.
Mollers, T., 2000. The Role of Law in European Integration. The American Journal of Compara-tive Law, 48: 681 – 692.
Sonneveldt, F., 1992. The Trust: Bridge or Abyss Between Common and Civil Law Jurisdic-tions? / F. Sonneveldt, H.L. van Mens. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxations Publishers, 98 pp.
Afanasev, D., 2012. Competition jurisdictions: sovereignty by 10%. Sheets, 117 (3131). (In Russian).
Medvedev, D.A., 2013. The Constitution, the functions of the Government of Russia and effec-tive management technologies. Zakon. 12: 32 - 40. (In Russian).
Sinenko, V., Tsukanova, E., Mityakina, N., Gusakova, Yu., Rubanov, S.,2017. Main models of corporate management: current state and development prospects. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. April. Special Edition: 333-337.
Turanin, V., Sinenko, V., Mityakina, N., Fedoryaschenko, A., Lilikova, O.,2017. Shareholders' Agreements versus Contemporary Legal Systems. International Journal of Economic Per-spectives, 11 (3).
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.