Cómo citar
Resumen
The essence of category "claim" concerning its understanding in material and legal and procedural and legal aspect was and remains at the moment one of the problem subjects in the legal doctrine. The above-stated conclusion is states that the modern legal framework has no official concept of "claim"; thereby the legislator provides a scope to scientists-jurists by means of ways, concepts and theories to define the legal nature of "claim". In this scientific article the sense of "claim" as uniform category in material and procedural aspect is revealed. Authors analyze the domestic legal doctrine, as well as the modern legislation in the field of the study subject is investigated. Value for the theory of the state and the law, the analysis of the real subject of a research consists in need of judgment of the approaches to understanding the category "claim" available in the legal doctrine and justification of the theory of unity as only true both for branch and theoretical science, and for law enforcement. Relevance of work is caused by the fact that periodically there is a reforming of the civil and procedural and arbitration and procedural legislation, as well as emergence of new types of judiciary in Russia, for example administrative legal proceedings, as well as also the material and legal beginnings of the studied category remain in view of what need of its analysis for this context is timely and logical.
Citas
"Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation" of 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ (an edition of 02.03.2016) (with amendment and additional, in force since 01.09.2016)//"A collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation", 18.11.2002, N 46, Art. 4532.
N. T. blackamoors. The counterclaim in the Soviet civil procedural law: Las Sci Autoref. Tomsk, 1965. Page 9.
Belilovsky D. I. Claims for recognition in the Soviet civil process: Diss. Law PhD. Kuibyshev, 1970. Page 42 - 45.
Vershinin A. P. Guarding material legal relations and right for judicial protection//Questions of the theory of guarding legal relationship. Materials of a scientific conference. Yaroslavl, 1991. Page 36.
Vinut M. A. Categories "material" and "procedural" in the theory of civil procedural law. Page 101.
Volozhanin V.P. The claim and prerequisites of right of action in criminal trial//Problems of reform of civil procedural law and practice of its application. Sverdlovsk, 1990. Page 36.
Gordon V. M. Claims for recognition. Yaroslavl, 1906. Page 4 - 5.
Gribanov V. P. Implementation and protection of the civil rights. Prod. the 2nd, stereotype. M.: Statute, 2001. Page 113.
Gross L.A. About the right of court to change a subject of the claim (on examples of cases of liability of workers and employees)//Jurisprudence. 1988. N 1. Page 83.
Gurvich M. A. Law of action: Studies. workbook. M, 1978. Page 6; Soviet civil process. M, 1985. Page 204 - 205.
Gurvich M. A. Judgment: theoretical problems. Page 58; Course of the Soviet civil procedural law. M, 1981. T. 1. Page 410.
Dobrovolsky A. A., Ivanov S.A. Main problems of a claim form of protection of the right. Mosk publishing house. univ. Moscow. 1979 Pages 17 - 18.
Eliseykin P. F. Concept of the right for presentation of the claim//Problems of a conceptual framework of science of civil and civil procedural law. Yaroslavl, 1987. Page 90.
Zheruolis I. A. About a ratio material and procedural in the claim//Forms of protection of the right and a ratio material and procedural at separate legal institutes. Kalinin, 1977. Page 14 - 15.
Zeyder N. B. The main questions of the doctrine of the claim in the Soviet civil process. Page 23 - 36.
Kleynman A. F. The main questions of the doctrine of the claim in the Soviet civil process. M, 1959. Page 5 - 22.
Kostrova N. M. Theory and practice of interaction of civil procedural and family law. Rostov, 1983. Page 22.
Mukhamedshin R. K. Change of the claim in civil legal proceedings: Autoref. PhD Law. M, 1981. Page 12, 14.
Lapin B. N. Civil and procedural aspect of use of the right//Jurisprudence. 1980. N 2. Page 61, 64.
Loginov P. V. The claim category and claim form of the law protection //Soviet state and right. 1983. N 2. Page 100.
Ogibalin Y. A. Material and legal and procedural guarantees of ensuring democracy and personal freedom. Tver, 1993. P.1. Page 137 - 148.
Osokina G. L. Problems of the claim and right of action. Page 19.
Ryazanovsky V. L. Unity of process. M, 1996. Page 13 - 14.
The Soviet civil process / Under the editorship of A. A. Dobrovolsky. M, 1979. Page 107.
Tkachyov N. I. Interindustry legal concepts (Methodological aspect)//Conceptual framework of science of the Soviet civil law and process and terminology of acts. Tver, 1991. Page 113.
Shalamov M. G. The civil suit in criminal case. M, 1948.
Textbook of the Russian civil legal proceedings of A. H. Golmsten. Prod. the 4th, rew. SPb., 1907. Page 136.
Chechen N. A. Main directions of development of science of the Soviet civil procedural law. L., 1987. Page 19 - 20.
Yudelson K. S. Soviet civil process. M, 1956. Page 199 - 200; The Soviet civil process / Under the editorship of K. I. Komissarov, V. M. Semenov. M, 1988. Page 231.
Jellinek G. System der subjektiven offentlichen Rechte. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1905.
Zivilprozessrecht/Begr. von Leo Rosenberg, fortgef. von Karl Heinz Schwab. Munchen, 1981.
Sevast'janov G.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy al'ternativnogo razreshenija sporov: koncepcija chastnogo processual'nogo prava//Hrestomatija al'ternativnogo razreshenija sporov: ucheb. - metod. materialy i prakticheskie rekomendacii. SPb.: ANO "Redakcija zhurnala "Tretejskij sud", 2009. S. 91 - 121.
Reshetnikova I.V. Unifikacija processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Zhdat' li revoljucij?!//Zakony Rossii. 2015. N 3. S. 3 - 9.
Latyev A.N. Koncepcija edinogo Grazhdanskogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossii: vzgljad s drugoj storony//Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2015. N 1. S. 46 - 71.