Palabras clave
EFL
retroalimentación
Cuenca
Ecuador
escritura
párrafos Teacher mini conferences in class
EFL
feedback
Cuenca
Ecuador
writing
paragraphs
Cómo citar
Resumen
Hattie y Timperley (2007) definen la retroalimentación como el resultado en el que un agente, como un maestro, proporciona información sobre los aspectos de la comprensión de la persona. La estrategia de retroalimentación que se implementó en este estudio fue mini conferencias de docente en clase. Esta estrategia consiste en actividades previas a la escritura y a la generación de ideas donde el maestro discute con toda la clase e ilustra qué habilidad deben usar los estudiantes (Grabe y Kaplan, 1996). El estudio se realizó en una escuela pública en la ciudad de Cuenca, Ecuador, con estudiantes que aprendían inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL). Consistió en un grupo de intervención (n = 36) y un grupo de control (n = 31). El estudio se realizó durante la primera unidad didáctica (seis semanas) del año escolar 2019-2020 donde los estudiantes produjeron un total de cinco párrafos. El primer párrafo cumplió el propósito de pretest, mientras que el último párrafo fue el post test. La prueba de signos de Wilcox se utilizó para la comparación entre muestras relacionadas (Pre - post) y la prueba de U-Mann Whitney para muestras independientes. Los datos se procesaron a través de SPSS 25.
Citas
Alirio, E., & Zambramo, L. (2011). Characterizing the feedback processes in the teaching practicum. Entornos. 24(1), 73-85.
Baker, W., & Hansen Bricker, R. (2010). The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback. System, 38(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.007
Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students' perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 5–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120101215
Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=f00SnQEACAAJ
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research methods in education. London; New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=77071
Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902894070.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman.
Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(02), 83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Ion, G., Barrera-Corominas, A., & Tomàs-Folch, M. (2016). Written peer-feedback to enhance students’ current and future learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0017-y
Kazemi, M., Abadikhah, S., & Dehqan, M. (2018). A comparison of teacher feedback versus students’ joint feedback on EFL students’ composition. The IUP Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 90–102.
Mahsood, N., Jamil, B., Mehboob, U., Kibria, Z., & Khalil, K. U. R. (2018). Feedback. The Professional Medical Journal, 25(01), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/18.4242
Millsap, R. E., Maydeu-Olivares, A., Sage Publications, & Sage eReference (Online service). (2009). The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=743581
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Paulus, T. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
Rajab, H., Khan, K., & Elyas, T. (2016). A case study of EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices in written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(1), 119-128.
Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools: Teacher feedback during active learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x
Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning: Effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 772–809. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531322
Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.006
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076157
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2020 Paul Ismael Siguenza, María-Isabel Espinoza