Predictores de la motivación intrí­nseca entre estudiantes universitarios: una aplicación de la teorí­a de la expectativa-valor. | Revista Publicando
Predictores de la motivación intrí­nseca entre estudiantes universitarios: una aplicación de la teorí­a de la expectativa-valor.
Organización de Empresas y Estudios Culturales
PDF (EN)
EPUB (EN)
HTML (EN)

Cómo citar

Mohd, Abdul, & Mohamad Shahril. (2019). Predictores de la motivación intrí­nseca entre estudiantes universitarios: una aplicación de la teorí­a de la expectativa-valor. Revista Publicando, 6(19), 40-61. Recuperado a partir de https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/1923

Resumen

Ha habido mucho debate sobre el sistema educativo de Malasia que va desde el desempleo hasta la falta de habilidades sociales. Ninguna de las universidades locales está clasificada dentro de las 50 mejores universidades asiáticas por Times Higher Education. El paí­s también alcanza puntajes promedio globales por debajo de la evaluación de referencia entre sus estudiantes de 15 años en matemáticas y ciencias conducidos por la OCDE. Otra tendencia preocupante es que los graduados se vuelvan más exigentes al seleccionar los programas y opten por la ruta más fácil al inscribirse en cursos que les permitan obtener puestos de carrera dentro de la función pública segura. En consideración a estos temas, es necesario comprender mejor la motivación de los estudiantes para sobresalir en sus estudios y los factores que los impulsan a lograr buenas calificaciones. Este estudio busca investigar la relación entre los factores internos y externos que llevan a los estudiantes a tener una motivación intrí­nseca para desempeñarse en sus estudios. Los factores internos son de naturaleza psicológica que comprende la competencia percibida y la autodeterminación, mientras que los factores externos comprenden el apoyo social y el entorno de aprendizaje. Una encuesta de campo que involucra a estudiantes de ciencias y disciplinas de ciencias sociales arroja 621 respuestas utilizables. Los resultados del análisis de regresión indican que todos los factores son significativos para predecir la motivación intrí­nseca de los estudiantes. Se encuentra que la autodeterminación es el factor más influyente, mientras que el ambiente de aprendizaje se considera el determinante menos importante en esta investigación. Posteriormente, las implicaciones tanto para académicos como para profesionales se discuten más a fondo en este documento.
PDF (EN)
EPUB (EN)
HTML (EN)

Citas

A. Bandura (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: Freeman.

A. Burdorf and T. Bruggeling (1996). Reliability of a questionnaire on sickness absence with specific attention to absence due to back pain and respiratory complaints. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, (1), 58-62.

A. Wigfield and J. Cambria, J. (2010). Students”™ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, (1), 1-35.

B. Cleveland and K. Fisher (2014) The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17, (1), 1-28.

C. Brewster and F. Fager J. (2000). Increasing student engagement and motivation: From time-on-task to homework. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

D. Coon and J. O. Mitterer (2012). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior with concept maps and reviews. Cengage Learning.

D. Maclntyre, K. MacMaster and S. C. Baker (2001). The convergence of multiple models of motivation for second language learning: Gardner, Pintrich, Kuhl, and McCroskey, In Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23), Edited Z. Domyei and R. Schmidt. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai, pp. 461-492.

D. Trouilloud, P. Sarrazin, P. Bressoux and J. Bois (2006). Relation between teachers' early expectations and students' later perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of educational psychology, 98, (1), 75-86.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, (2), 109-134.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (2002) Self-determination research: reflections and future directions, In Handbook on self-determination research, Edited E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, pp. 431-441.

E. Tezci, F. Sezer, U. Gurgan, and S. Aktan (2015). A Study on Social Support and Motivation. Anthropologist, 22, (2), 284-292.

F. M. Newmann and G. G. Wehlage (1993). Five standards for authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50, (7), 8-12.

H. A. Tharbe (2006). Coping with Stress: Are Our Students Proactive? Masalah Pendidikan, (29), 57-66.

I. Cirik (2015). Relationships between Social Support, Motivation, and Science Achievement: Structural Equation Modeling. Anthropologist, 20, (1-2), 232-242.

J. A. M. Murcia, E. C. Gimeno, and A. M. Camacho (2007). Measuring self-determination motivation in a physical fitness setting: validation of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) in a Spanish sample. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47, (3), 366.

J. E. Martin and L. H. Marshall (1995). Choice Maker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, (309), 147-156.

J. Eccles (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors, In Achievement and achievement motives, Edited J. T. Spence. San Francisco: Freeman, pp. 75-146.

J. G. Nicholls, P. C. Cheung, J. Lauer, and M. Patashnick (1989) Individual differences in academic motivation: Perceived ability, goals, beliefs, and values. Learning and individual differences, 1 (1), 63-84.

J. Herrington and A. Herrington (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 17, (3), 305-322.

K. A. D”™souza and S. Maheshwari (2015). A Methodological Approach for Studying Public Bus Transit Driver Distraction. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 10, (2), 229-244.

K. J. Pugh and D. A. Bergin (2006) Motivational influences on transfer. Educational Researcher. (41), 147–160.

K. R. Wentzel (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, (2), 202-209.

L. G. Pelletier, S. F. Michelle, R. J. Vallerand, and M. B. Nathalie (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion. 25, (4), pp. 279-306.

L. M. Jeno and A. Diseth (2014). A self-determination theory perspective on autonomy support, autonomous self-regulation, and perceived school performance, Reflecting Education, 9, (1), 1-20.

L. Nota, S. Soresi, L. Ferrari and M. L. Wehmeyer (2010). A Multivariate Analysis of the Self-Determination of Adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, (2), 245-266.

M. D. L. Mata V. Monteiro and F. Peixoto (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child development research.

M. J. Mendell and G. A. Heath (2005). Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor Air, 15, (1), 27-52.

M. Wehmeyer (1995). A Career Education Approach: Self-Determination for Youth with Mild Cognitive Disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, (30), 157-63.

N. Vernadakis, O. Kouli, O., E. Tsitskari, A. Gioftsidou, and P. Antoniou (2014). University students' ability-expectancy beliefs and subjective task values for exergames, Computers & Education, (75), 149-161.

P. R. Pintrich and D. H. Schunk (2002) Motivation in education: Theory. Research, and Applications, Second Edition. Ohio: Ohio Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, American Psychologist. (55), 68–78.

R. M. Ryan and J. Stiller (1991). The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation, and learning, In Advances in motivation and achievement, Edited P. R. Pintrich and M. L. Maehr. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 115–149.

S. Field, J. Martin, R. Miller, M. Ward, and M. Wehmeyer (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children.

S. M. Kiefer, K. M. Alley and C. R. Ellerbrock (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents”™ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMLE Online, 38, (8), 1-18.

W. Ahmed, A. Minnaert, G. van der Werf, and H. Kuyper (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents”™ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, (1), 36-46.

W. J. Meerding W. Ijzelenberg M.A. Koopmanschap J.L. Severens and A. Burdorf (2005). Health problems lead to considerable productivity loss at work among workers with high physical load jobs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, (58), 517–523.

Y. Nissim, E. Weissblueth, L. Scott-Webber, and S. Amar (2016) The effect of a stimulating learning environment on pre-service Teachers' Motivation and 21st Century Skills. Journal of education and learning, 5, (3), 29-39.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.