The archetype of garden in the works of tatar poets of the xx-th century in the context of the dialogue of cultures | Revista Publicando
The archetype of garden in the works of tatar poets of the xx-th century in the context of the dialogue of cultures
PDF (EN)

Palabras clave

empresas familiares
modelos estratégicos
estructuras
procesos.

Cómo citar

Alina R., Alfiya F., Sergey A., & Gulnar A. (2018). The archetype of garden in the works of tatar poets of the xx-th century in the context of the dialogue of cultures. Revista Publicando, 5(16 (1), 725-745. Recuperado a partir de https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/1539

Resumen

The archetype of the garden is a universal aesthetic category, which is inherent in literatures and cultures of many people belonging to different religions (Christianity, Islam). The application of this category to the analysis of the works of Tatar poets of the twentieth century makes it possible to consider both the specificity of functional and semantic embodiment of the archetype of the garden and to make a generalized conclusion about the tradition and innovation in the context of the dialogue of cultures. The novelty of the research is both in the material (the archetype of the garden in the works of Kh.  Tufan, and I.  Yuzeev is not the subject of considerable scientific interest nowadays) and in research methods relevant to the material. Having considered the peculiarity of the embodiment of the archetype of the garden in the works of modern Tatar poets who were deeply rooted in their native literature and culture, it is possible to identify the similarities and differences associated with the choice of artistic means, their world outlook and the relationship to the traditions of Oriental and Western cultures. For example, the symbolism of the images of the garden, apple tree, cultivatedand wild flowers and plants allows K. Tufan to express his innermost reflections on philosophical and moral problems. The image of the garden in the Tatar poetry of the twentieth century takes on some symbolic features. In I. Yuzeev`s poetry the image of the garden appears in the traditions of the ancient mythological view on the world as a single harmonious whole. The results of the research given in the article provide possibilities of studying other universals in the poetry of the authors under review and other contemporary poets.

PDF (EN)

Citas

Domansky Y.V. Sensemaking role of archetypical meanings in the literary text: Textbook for the course. – Tver, 2001. – 94 p.

Lotman Y. M. Inside the thinking world – M.: Azbuka, 2016. – 448 p.

E. Meletisky Y.M. About literary archetypes. – M.: Russian State University for Humanities, 1991. – 136 p.

Galimullin F.G., Galimullina A.F., Mingazova L.I. The development of the literatures of the people of the Volga region in multi-ethnic Russia. Journal of Language and Literature 2014; 5(3), 248-252.

Zinnatullina, Z.R., Khabibullina, L.F. Mythologization of History in English literature by the end of the Twentieth Century (John Fowles, A. Burgess) // Journal of Language and Literature, Volume 6, Issue 2, 2015, pp. 76-78.

Zagidullina D., Amineva V. Avant-Garde Research in the Field of Verse Forms // XLinguae European Scientific Language Journal. Volume 9. Issue 1, January 2016. – Ð . 135 – 145.

KhisamovaV.N., Khismatullina L.M. Comparative – Analysis Based Study of Synonymous Relational Adjectives in Tatar and English // Mediteranean Journal of Social Sciences 6 (3#2) : 395 – 400, 2015

Zamaletdinov R.R., Yusupov F.Y., Karabulatova I.S., Yusupov A.F., Husnutdinov D.H. The formation of Tatars ethnic groups in the southern Urals and trans Urals region // Life Science Journal, 2014, Volume 11, Issue 11s, pp. 214-217.

Yusupova Z.F. Literary Text as a Unit of Culture in the Classes of Russian as a Second Language //Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 6; 2015 PP 171-175.

Yusupova N. M. Revival of Sufi –religious symbolism in Tatar poetry of the XX–XXI centuries (on the material of poetic works of G. SalIm) // Philology and Culture. 2015. No. 3 (41). San. 284-287.

Amineva, V.R. Phenomenon of border in interliterary dialogues // Journal of language and literature (JLL). – 2015. ISSN: 2078-0303, Vol. 6. No. 2. 2015. Ð . 246 – 249.

Amineva, V. R., M.I. Ibragimov, E.F. Nagumanova, A.Z. Khabibullina. Motif as a concept of comparative poetics. // Journal of Language and Literature 2014; 5(3), 17-21.

Mukhametshina R.F., Galimullina A.F. Inculcation of Bimental personality in context of cultural dialogue (as exemplified by Tatarstan Schools) // Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 2014, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp. 2135-2138.

Berry E., Epstein M. Transcultural Experiments: Russian and American Models of Creative Communication. NewYork: St. Martin'sPress, 1999. 340 p.

Kristeva J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press. 305 p.

Genette G. Palimpsestes, La littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil, 1982, 472 p.

Tufan K. F. Works : in 5 volumes / Khasan Tufan; edited by M. Gainetdinova. Poems. - Kazan: Tatar. Book. Publishing., 2008. – 415 p.

Yuzeev I. G. The Book of love. Poems, songs. “Library of poems” series. – Kazan: Tatar. Book Publishing., 1982. - 352 p.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.