Cómo citar
Resumen
The criminal process in bothSwitzerlandandRussiahas traditionally been related to a mixed type, which assumes that pre-trial stages are based on the inquisitional (investigative) beginning, and judicial - on the adversarial. At the same time, the purpose of legal proceedings, in the opinion of the majority of continental proceduralists, is to establish material truth. It is on its achievement directed investigative and other procedural actions. At the same time, the question inevitably arises about the nature, limits and logic of the cognitive activity of criminal justice bodies. In this regard, the author, on the basis of normative and doctrinal sources, including German, Swiss, Austrian, examines the procedural and legal principles in dubio pro reo (in doubt - in favour of the accused) and in dubio pro duriore (in doubt - according to the strictest version ) on the example of the Swiss and Russian law and order. It is shown that in the criminal justice of these states they balance among themselves and counterbalance each other. According to the European approach discussed in the article, the principle in dubio pro duriore in order to establish the material truth in pre-trial proceedings somewhat restricts, constricts the presumption of innocence. On the contrary, when considering a case in a court of first instance, the latter manifests its full force. In this article it is shown that in the domestic science the principle in dubio pro duriore has not yet been developed, but has become widespread in practice. In the Russian legal literature, the ratio of the principles in dubio pro reo and in dubio pro duriore has not been studied practically at present either in monographs or in other publications. This article will serve to eliminate and fill this gap.
Citas
Aus 29 mach 1, Konzept einer eidgení¶ssischen Strafprozessordnung, Bericht der Expertenkommission «Vereinheitlichung des Strafprozessrechts ». Eidgení¶-ssisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartament. 1997. S. 1-341.
Bericht des Bundesrates í¼ber Motionen und Postulate der gesetzgebenden Rí¤te 2010. Bern, 2010. S. 1-232.
Donatsch A., Hansjakob T., Lieber V. Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung (StPO). Zí¼rich, 2010. S. 1-2214.
Niggli M., Heer M., Wiprí¤chtiger H. Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung. Ju-gendstrafprozessordnung. Basel, 2010. S. 1-2121.
Oberholzer N. Grundzí¼ge des Strafprozessrechts, dargestellt am Beispiel des Kan-tons St.Gallen. St.Gallen, 2005. S. 1-342.
Pieth M. Srtafverteidigung - wozu? Standpunkte Kontrovers. Basel, 1986. S. 1-354.
Roxin C. Einfí¼hrung // Strafprozessordnung. Mí¼nchen, 2009. S. 1-221.
Hatami, Mohsen and Shafieardekani, Mohsen (2014). The Effect of Industrialization on Land Use Changes; Evidence from Intermediate Cities of Iran. International Journal of Current Life Sciences, 4 (12), 11899-11902.
Saladin P. Das Verfassungsprinzip der Fairness // Erhaltung und Entfaltung des Rechts in der Rechtssprechung des schweizerischen Bundesgerichts. Festgabe des schweizerischen Rechtsfakultí¤ten zur Hundertjahrfeier des Bundesgerichts. Basel, 1975. S. 1-645.
Schlauri R. Die abgekí¼rzte Verfahren in den Strafprozessordnungen der Kantone Baselland und Tessin – eine schweizerische Form des US-amerikanischen plea bargaining? // Ackermann J.-B. Strafrecht als Herausforderung. Zí¼rich, 1999. S. 1-674.
Schleiminger D. Konfrontation im Strafprozess, Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. d EMRK mit be-sonderer Berí¼cksichtigung des Verhí¤ltnisses zum Opferschutz im Bereich von Sexualdelikten gegen Minderjí¤hrigen. Basel, 2001. S. 1-323.
Schmidt N. Einfí¼hrung in die Geschichte der deutschen Strafrechtspflege. Gí¶ttin-gen, 1893. S. 1-434.
Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung und Schweizerische Ju-gendstrafprozessordnung // Polizeiliche Ermittlung und Vorverfahren. Einleitung des Verfahrens – Anwalt der ersten Stunde – Intensití¤t der Strafverfolgung von Prof. Dr. iur. Christof Riedo und Dr. iur. Gerhard Fiolka. Bern. 2010. S. 1-224.
Golovko L. V. "The Principle in dubio pro duriore" and the theory of continuous doubts or the benefits of studying the Swiss criminal procedure doctrine" // Law. 2016, No. 8. Pp. 72-84.
Klyuvgant V.V .Accusatory bias in Latin (notes on the article AA Trefilov) / / Law. 2016, No. 6. Pp. 74-78.
Kondrat I. N. Legal conflicts arising from the implementation of the principle "in dubio pro reo" in the Russian criminal trial // the Russian justice. 2011. N 8.
E. A. Kopylova. Legi FACTA non est idem quod ipsius provideo possibilitatis ab-sentiam: case "Soros V. France" // International justice. 2012. N 3. Pp. 7 – 15.
Shafieardekani, M. and Hatami, M., Forecasting Land Use Change in suburb by using Time series and Spatial Approach; Evidence from Intermediate Cities of Iran. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2013. 116 (2): p. 199-208.
Kolosovsky V. V. On the ratio of qualification "with reserve", accusatory bias and qualification errors // Russian legal journal. 2011. N 3.
Nazarov A. D. Influence of the investigative errors on the errors of the court. SPb., 2003.
European court of human rights/ Judgement of 04.12.2000 (complaint No. 39272/98) [eng.] / / The judgement was obtained from the server of the European court of human rights < / http://www.echr.coe.int>.
Justice in the modern world: monograph/ under the editorship of V. M. Lebedev, T. Y. Khabrieva. M., 2012.
The Order of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia N 38, the Prosecutor General of Russia N 14, SK of Russia N 5 of 16.01.2015 "about the approval of the In-struction about the order of consideration of applications, messages on crimes and other information on the incidents connected with unknown disappearance of persons" ("Rossiyskaya Gazeta", n 65, 30.03.2015).
Rakhmanova E. N. On the aims and objectives of the criminal law // Advocate prac-tice. 2015. N 1.
Trefilov A.A. Criminal proceedings in foreign countries. Volume 1. M., 2016. Pp. 1-1012.
Trefilov A.A. Criminal proceedings in foreign countries. Volume 2. M., 2018. Pp. 1-1006.