Cómo citar
Resumen
One can refer to some of the principles governing over institution of principal prosecution such as legality of prosecution (Article 2 of criminal procedure code approved in 2013), presumption of innocence (Article 4 of aforesaid code), arraignment (op. cit. Article 5), principle of contingency of criminal prosecution (op. cit. Articles 22 and 80), principle of requisite for receiving of security from culprit (Article 217 of aforesaid code), principle of acceleration in prosecution (op. cit., Article 3), principle of summon prior to detainment (Aforementioned code, Articles 168 and 203), and blackmail etc. each of which has devoted to one of the important topics. Observance of all governing principles may be helpful and efficient in facilitation, prosecution, and addressing of rights for citizens and therefore they may create coordination among prosecution institution of Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) with world standards. The criminal procedure code approved in 2013 has created new order in relations among criminal justice system and their relations between them with limits of powers for their legislations by approval and entry into executive field of courts. The public prosecutor is one of the persons who possess special importance for which some wider range is visible in limits of powers and legislations of this position compared to this code (approved in 1999) with some modern inventions e.g. right of supervision and teachings for public prosecutor in provincial capital and other affiliated public prosecutors and this is assumed as a turning point per se. In addition to chairmanship in public prosecutor”™s office and his tasks in investigation and prosecution, the public prosecutor has other duties such as order to commencement of execution of primary investigations to interrogator, supervision over administrators, and teaching of them and so forth so we will discuss about them in this survey.Citas
Khaleghi, Ali (2015). Criminal procedure, Tehran: Institute for legal studies and researches Shahr-E-Danesh.
Shamloo Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein (2011).Public prosecutor”™s office and primary investigations, Dadyar Pub, 2nd vol.
Barak, Aharon M. (2006).The judge in a democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah (2002). Liberty: incorporating four essays in liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashoori, Mohammad (?).An outlook to defensive rights of culprit in basic law and procedure code of general and revolutionary courts in criminal matters.Journal of Qom higher education complex, series 3, vol. 3.
Bayat, Behrouz (2016).The rights of convict at process of judge enforcement.MA thesis in penal law criminology.Qom Mofid University.
Jabari, Afsaneh (2013).Position of prosecution institution in criminal law.Presented in Ekhtebar legal website.
Hatami, Mohsen and Shafieardekani, Mohsen (2014). The Effect of Industrialization on Land Use Changes; Evidence from Intermediate Cities of Iran. International Journal of Current Life Sciences, 4 (12), 11899-11902.
Khazayee, Dr. Manoochehr (1998).Criminal process (collection of essays).1st Ed., Ganj-E-Danesh Pub.
Shamloo Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein (2004).Public prosecutor”™s office and primary investigations, Dadyar Pub, 2nd Ed.
Ziayee Bigdeli (Dr.), Mohammad Reza (2000).General international law.Library of Ganj-E-Danesh.15th Ed.
Erfani, Mahmud (2003).Trade law.Mizan Pub, 4th Ed.
Burban, Stephen B. (2003). ”˜What do we mean by judicial independence”™, Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 64: 323.
Ismaili (Dr.), Ali Akbar (?) Implications of criminal procedure code.Islamic Azad University, Gorgan branch, 2nd semester of academic year 2015-16.
With criminal procedure of actions caused by crime and primary investigations, Tehran: Khorsandi Pub, (2015).
Yavari, Asadollah (2016).Right of enjoyment of fair litigation and modern proceeding.
Di Feredrico, Giuseppe (summer 1998). ”˜Prosecutorial independence and the democratic requirement of accountability in Italy”™, bit.j.criminol.vol.38.
Markin, Robert M (2004).Arbitration and award _England/arbitration and award_Wales/London 11p.
Ghaem MaghamFarahani, Mohammad Hossein (Dr.).(1996). Trade law for bankruptcy.Dadgosatar Pub.
Hadizadeh, Reza (2011).Analysis on principle of separation of prosecution authority from investigation position in Iranian criminal procedure.
Hatami, Mohsen & Ameri Siahooei, Elham (2013). Examines criteria applicable in the optimal location new cities, with approach for sustainable urban development. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14 (5), 734-743.
Alipour, Moslem (2012).The role of public prosecutor”™s office in criminal proceedings, Penal law and criminology, Islamic Azad University, Damghan branch.
Jabari, Yadollah (2015).Tasks and powers of public prosecutor in criminal matters.Penal law and criminology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Department of Law.
Palangi, Fatemeh (2016). Review on limits of powers for public prosecutor with focus on criminal procedure code 2013. Penal law and criminology, Islamic Azad University, Geran branch, Department of Law.
Di Federico,Giuseppe(summer1998) “prosecutorial independence and the democratic requirement of accountability in Italy”.brit.j.criminol.vol.38.
Ramseyer,j.mark&ericb.rasmusen (1997),judicial independence in civil law regime:the evidence from hapan”journal of law,economic and organization,v.13n.2.259-286
Woodhouse,diana(2007),united kingdom:the constitutional reform act 2005-defending judicial independence the English way “,i.con,oxford university press and new York university school of law ,vol.5,no.1,153-165
Shetreet,shimon(1976),judges on trial;a study of the appointmentand accountability of the English judiciary ,amesterdam:north-holland publishing.