Cómo citar
Resumen
El control de autoridades está reconocido como una tarea compleja en el proceso de catalogación. Esta es un área de investigación activa en el presente para bibliotecas e instituciones de investigación relacionadas aun cuando varias aproximaciones se han propuesto para la temática. En este trabajo proponemos AUCTORITAS, una herramienta que brinda servicios de alto valor en la Web para apoyar el proceso de control de autoridades en un ambiente institucional genérico. Este artículo describe los servicios Web de AUCTORITAS, su modelo de acceso a datos basado en ontologías y cómo los lenguajes de la Web Semántica hacen posible la integración de fuentes de datos heterogéneas.
Citas
Alistair Miles, S. R. A. L. / U. of O., & Sean Bechhofer, U. of M. (2010). SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. W3C Recommendation 18 August 2009.
Bagosi, T., Calvanese, D., Hardi, J., Komla-Ebri, S., Lanti, D., Rezk, M., ”… Xiao, G. (2014). The ontop framework for ontology based data access. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 480, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45495-4_6
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
Botoeva, E., Calvanese, D., Cogrel, B., Rezk, M., & Xiao, G. (2016). OBDA beyond relational DBs: A study for MongoDB. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1577).
Bourdon, F., & Zillhardt, S. (1997). Author: Vers une base européenne de notices d”™autorité auteurs. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 26(2), 34–37.
Bregzis, R. (1982). The syndetic structure of the catalog authority control: the key to tomorrow”™s catalog. Proceedings of the 1979 Library and Information Technology Association Institutes, Phoenix, AZ, 24.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., & Rosati, R. (2017). Ontology-Based Data Access and Integration. In L. Liu & M. T. í–zsu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Database Systems (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_80667-1
Calvanese, D., Liuzzo, P., Mosca, A., Remesal, J., Rezk, M., & Rull, G. (2016). Ontology-based data integration in EPNet: Production and distribution of food during the Roman Empire. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 51, 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.005
Cerans, K., & BÅ«mans, G. (2011). RDB2OWL : a RDB-to-RDF / OWL Mapping Specification Language. Information Systems, (August), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-687-4-139
Diaz-Valenzuela, I., Martin-Bautista, M. J., Vila, M. A., & Campaña, J. R. (2013). An automatic system for identifying authorities in digital libraries. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3994–4002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.010
Dunsire, G., & Willer, M. (2011). Standard library metadata models and structures for the Semantic Web. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051111145118
Fernández-Peña, F., Urrutia-Urrutia, P., Cañete, R., Acosta-Sánchez, R., Yañez-Márquez, C., & Nummenmaa, J. (2016). A conceptual data model for the automatic generation of data views. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 10(4), 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/100412
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
Harper, C. A., & Tillett, B. B. (2007). Library of Congress Controlled Vocabularies and Their Application to the Semantic Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(3/4), 47–68. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n03_03
Hodge, G. (2000). Systems of Knowledge Organization for Digital Libraries: Beyond Traditional Authority Files. Knowledge Organization. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM0204_10
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P. F., & Van Harmelen, F. (2003). From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a Web Ontology Language. Web Semantics, 1(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2003.07.001
Lausch, A., Schmidt, A., & Tischendorf, L. (2015). Data mining and linked open data – New perspectives for data analysis in environmental research. Ecological Modelling, 295, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.018
Leiva-Mederos, A., Senso, J. A., Domínguez-Velasco, S., & Hípola, P. (2013). AUTHORIS: a tool for authority control in the semantic web. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-20112-0135
Library of Congress. (2016). Library of Congress Subject Headings. Retrieved from http://id.loc.gov/download/
Lubetsky, S. (1985). The Principles of Descriptive Cataloging. In Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook (pp. 106–112).
Motik, B., Horrocks, I., & Sattler, U. (2009). Bridging the gap between OWL and relational databases. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 7(2), 74–89.
Munir, K., Odeh, M., & McClatchey, R. (2012). Ontology-driven relational query formulation using the semantic and assertional capabilities of OWL-DL. Knowledge-Based Systems, 35, 144–159.
Mustafa, A. S., & Kumaraswamy, Y. S. (2014). Performance evaluation of web-services classification. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 7(10), 1674–1681.
ORCID. (2017). ORCID | Connecting Research and Researchers. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/
Santoso, H. A., Haw, S. C., & Abdul-Mehdi, Z. T. (2011). Ontology extraction from relational database: Concept hierarchy as background knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.11.003
Thomson-Reuters. (2016). ResearcherID. Retrieved from http://www.researcherid.com
Tillett, B. B. (2009). Authority Control : State of the Art and New Perspectives. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3/4), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v38n03_04
Wilson, K. (2011). Electronic Journals: Cataloging and Management Practices in Academic Libraries. Serials Review, 37(4), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2011.10765401