Robustness and Reliability Evaluation of a model for firm performance
PDF (Inglés)

Palabras clave

educational process
education
innovation
technology
traditional form of education
integrated lesson
educational-methodical complex.

Cómo citar

Robustness and Reliability Evaluation of a model for firm performance. (2018). Revista Publicando, 5(14 (2), 166-182. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/1137

Resumen

Giving and seeking help are basic individuals”™ needs; currently helping in the workplace is a subject of great interest. This research aim is to evaluate the reliability and robustness of a model for firm performance, through the variables of seeking and giving help for a good business performance. This research has a qualitative-quantitative approach of correlational, explanatory, cross-sectional type, in five Ecuador-China collaborative work companies. As a tool for data collection, a survey was used, which was later validated by experts using the Murayama's method, a pilot test was carried out and after that the reliability was determined by the Cronbach”™s Alpha method. Finally, the theoretical model prepared has the reliability and robustness to be applied in the analysis and projections of the studied companies all this is confirmed by statistical methods. These methods are used in their evaluation and it was concluded that when there are quality interpersonal relationships (RQ), seeking help (HS) is more frequent or probable. In labour relationships, the relationships of hierarchy (HR) together with the mediator for help seeking (HS) are effectively correlated. It was shown that when Hierarchy Relationships (HR) are satisfactory, it is more viable to provide help (HG); however, the model showed that these variables have no significant relationships on firm performance.

PDF (Inglés)

Referencias

Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation inmanufacturing ï¬rms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 245–259.

Bouckenooghe, D., Asma, Z., & Raja, U. (2015). How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees”™ Job Performance:The Mediating Roles of Goal Congruence and Psychological Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 251–264.

Dar, O. L. (February de 2010). Trust In Co-Workers and Employee Behaviours At Work. International Review of Business Research Papers , 6(1), 194-204 .

Flynn, F., & Brockner, J. (2003). It”™s Different to Give Than to Receive: Predictors of Givers”™ and Receivers”™ Reactions to Favor Exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1034-1045.

Geller, D., & Bamberger, P. (2012). The Impact of Help Seeking on Individual Task Performance: The Moderating Effect of Help Seekers”™ Logics of Action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 487–497.

Mueller, J., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Why Seeking Help From Teammates Is a Blessing and a Curse: A Theory of Help Seeking and Individual Creativity in Team Contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 263–276.

Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams. Organization Science , 502–517.

Wayne, S., Shore, L., & Liden, R. (1997). Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 82-111.

Bamberger, P. (2009). Employee help-seeking :Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 28, 49–98.

Batson , C., Sympson, S., Hindman, J., Decruz, P., Todd, R., Weeks, J., Burris, C. (1996). I've Been there, Too": Effect on Empathy of Prior Experience with a Need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 474–482.

Batson, C., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1656–1666.

Bennett, R., & Barkensjo, A. (2005). Relationship quality, relationship marketing and client perceptions of levels of service quality of charitable organisations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 81-97.

Bhal , K., & Ansari, M. (2007). Leader”member exchange”subordinate outcomes relationship: role of voice and justice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20-35.

Blau, P. (1963). Dynamics of bureaucracy. University of Chicago Press.

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Transaction Publishers.

Cavallo, J., & Higgins, E. (2013). Help that fits: Tailoring help to value, truth, and control concerns.

Cavallo, J., Zee, K., & Tory, E. (2016). Giving the Help That Is Needed: How Regulatory Mode Impacts Social Support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1111–1128.

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment,Organization and Top Managers. British Journal of Management, 215–236.

Deborah, F. H., & Sandberg, W. (2000). Friendship Within Entrepreneurial Teams and its Association with Team and Venture Performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Winter 2000, p. 5.

Feeney , B., & Collins , N. (2015). A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 113-147.

Flynn, F. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 737–750.

Flynn, F., & Bohns, V. (2008). Journal of Personality and Social Journal of Personality and Social, 128-143.

Gerdes, K. E. (2011). Empathy, sympathy, and pity: 21stcentury definitions and implications for practice and research. Journal of Social Service Research, 230–241.

Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 161–178.

Graen, G., Novak, M., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader member exchange and job design on productivity and job satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 109–131.

Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor:Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 1033–1039.

Grant, A., Dutton, J., & Rosso, B. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 898–918.

Grodal, S., Nelson, A., & Siino, R. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: continual engagement in innovative work. Academy of Management Journal, 136-168.

Gruenfeld, D., & Tiedens, L. (2010). Organizational Preferences and Their Consequences. Handbook of Social Psychology, 1252-1287.

Hofmann, D., Lei, Z., & Grant, A. (2009). Seeking Help in the Shadow of Doubt: The Sensemaking Processes Underlying How Nurses Decide Whom to Ask for Advice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1261-1264.

Kee, D., Ansari, M., & Aafaqi, R. (2004). Fairness of human resource management practices, leader-member exchange and organizational commitment. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 99-120.

Leavitt, H. (2005). Hierarchies, authority, and leadership. Leader to Leader; San Francisco, 55-61.

Lee, F. (2002). The social costs of seeking help. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 17-35.

Lee, J. (2005). Effects of leadership and leader”member exchange on commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 655-672.

Leender, R., Van Engelen, J., & Kratzer, J. (2007). Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 166–79.

Leenders, R., & Dolfsma, W. (2015). Social Networks for Innovation and New Product Development. Product Development & Managment Association, 123-131.

Li, S., & Liao, S. (2017). Help Others and Yourself Eventually: Exploring the Relationship between Help-Giving and Employee Creativity under the Model of Perspective Taking. Frontiers in psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01030

Liu, X. M., & Batt, R. (2010). How supervisors influence performance: a multilevel study of coaching and group management in technology-mediated services. Personnel Psychology, 265–298. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01170.x

Moon, F. (2014). Social Networks in the History of Innovation and Invention. New York: Springer.

Nadler, A., Ellis, S., & Bar, I. (2003). To Seek or Notto Seek: The Relationship Between Help Seekingand Job PerformanceEvaluations as Moderatedby Task-Relevant Expertise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 91-109.

Navarro, M., & Carmona-Lavado, A. (2010). Cómo afecta la relación del empleado con el lí­der a su compromiso con la organización. Universia Business Review, 112-132.

Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L.-E. (2008). Employee Motivation, A Powerful New Model. Harvard Business Review, 1-8.

Nystrom, P. (1990). Organizational commitment. Group and Organization Studies, 296–312.

Podsakoff , N., Whiting , S., Podsakoff , P., & Blume, B. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 122–141.

Rawlins, W. K. (1994). Being there and growing apart: Sustaining friendships through adulthood. Communication and relational maintenance, 275–294.

Rijt, J., Bossche, P. V., Wiel, M., Maeyer, S., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (3 de January de 2013). Asking for Help: A relational perspective on help seeking in th workplace. Vocations and Learning, 6(2), 259-279.

Roberts, L., Salem, D., Rappaport, J., Toro, P., Luke, D., & Seidman, E. (1999). Giving and Receiving Help: Interpersonal Transactions in Mutual-Help Meetings and Psychosocial Adjustment of Members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 841–868.

Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship Quality and Relationship Context as Antecedents of Person- and Task-Focused Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255–267.

Sias, P. (2005). Workplace Relationship Quality and Employee Information Experiences. Communication Studies, 375–395.

Studdard, N. L., & Munchus, G. (15 de Febrary de 2008). Entrepreneurial firms”™ acquisition of knowledge using proactive help-seeking behaviour. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 242-261.

Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31( 6), 947-967.

Thacker, R., & Stoner, J. (2012). Supervisors”™ Instrumental and Emotional Influences on Subordinate Help-Seeking Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40-61.

Van der Rijt, J., Bossche, P. V., Wiel, M. W., Maeyer, S. D., Gijselaers, W. H., & Segers, M. S. (2013). Asking for Help: A Relational Perspective on Help Seeking in the Workplace. Vocations and Learning, 6, 259–279.

Weerd-Nederhof, P., Pacitti, B., Silva Gomes, J., & Pearson, A. (2002). Tools for the improvement of organizational learning processes in innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 320-331.

Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia

Bajo los siguientes términos:

Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.

NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.

CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la lamisma licencia del original.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.