Palabras clave
metacognitive reflexive technologies
information and communication technologies
subject-specific thinking.
Cómo citar
Resumen
With regard to this issue that progress and growth of any society directly are arising from those activities which are done by manager and teachers, school has the important and very vital role in training the initiator, creative and committed force and with regard to this issue that schools differ from each other quantitatively and qualitatively, nowadays, in the discussions of educational planning, the subject of creativity and teaching-learning process has special place. With regard to the importance of the subject, the aim of this paper is pathology of teaching-learning process with emphasis on creativity of students. This paper is from the theoretical type and in order to collect the information, the library method is used. The studies showed that the relational methods of teachers with students are as an effective factor on learning and teaching of students. The methods arising from teaching of teachers also can influence on learning and teaching process of students. There is much diversity in teaching methods and the teachers have found out more importance of process in comparison with product. The teachers know that the method of student learning is important as much as teaching content. This movement emphasizes on process and forms a part of the process of using the learning activities. The learning activities demand the active partnership of students. Partnership causes more understanding, better skill and learning transmission and influences on motivation and attitude to the learning so much.Citas
Rajabi, Mehdi (2009). Studying the effect of information and communications technology courses on creativity of employees and trainees of the technical and professional center of Isfahan City, MSc thesis, Arak University.
Seif, Ali Akbar, (2008). The training and nourishment psychology. Tehran: Agah Publications.
Ahanchian, Mohammad Reza, (2004). Education and training in post-modern conditions, first edition, Tehran: Tahouri Publications.
Patrik, Kirk, (2003). The effectiveness of educational courses (KirkPatrik's Model), translated by Abbasian Abdolhossein.
Tauber, Robert, T, (2006). The alphabet of classroom management: Some strategies for effective teaching, translated by Sarkar Arani, Mohammad Reza, fifth edition, Tehran: The School Publications.
Rogers, Bill, (2005). Teacher leadership and behavior management in schools (a new look to the methods of management and behavior of students), translated by Eftekhari, Seyed Reza, first edition, Tehran: Avaye Kelk- Ghou Publications.
Soleimanpur, Javad, (2002). The skills of teaching and learning, first edition, Tehran: Ahsan Publications.
Seif, Ali Akbar, (2002), the training psychology (learning and teaching psychology), ninth edition, Tehran: Agah.
Seif, Ali Akbar, (2002). The theory of learning constructiveness and its educational applications, quarterly periodical of teaching and training, special journal of teaching methods, seventeenth year, No.1.
Sha'bani Vorki, Bakhtiar, (2001). The teaching-learning approaches, first edition, Mashhad: Astan Qods Razavi.
Safavi, Amanallah, (2007). Studying the possibility to approach the findings of logical empiricism and activism schools about the role of teacher and learner in the teaching-learning process and its effects on teaching and training, journal of psychology and educative sciences, No.1.
Alipur Moshkani, Mehran, (2003). The custom of teaching and method of holding the classroom, first edition, Qom: Parsayan Publications.
Fathi Azar, Eskandar, (2004). The methods and techniques of teaching, first edition, Tabriz: Tabriz University.
Ghourchian, Nader Gholi, (2007). The details of teaching methods, fourth edition, Tehran: The thought trans-cognitive publications.
Cannon, Robert; Newbell, David, (2007). The guide of improving the teaching in the universities and higher education centers, translated by Nasr, Ahmad Reza and et al, first edition, Isfahan: Isfahan University Publications.
Loi, A, (2004). The principles of educational planning (the schools curriculum), translated by Mashayekh, Farideh, twentieth century, Tehran: School Publications.
Mozaffari, Majid, (2004). The imagination power and using it in the teaching process, the Amouzeh Quarterly Periodical, No.19.
Naemi, Ali Mohammad, (2007). The psychology of teaching the skills of relation and language, first edition, Mashhad: Nashr Publications.
Foroughi, Ahmad Ali; Moshkelani, Parvaneh, (2006). The effect of teaching method of team discussion on creativity of students in the second year of guidance schools, region3, Isfahan, in the social sciences lesson. Journal of knowledge and investigation in educative sciences, Islamic Azad University, Khurasgan Branch (Isfahan), No.5 and6, pages: 45-58.
Ahmadi, Ali, (2002), the new methods of teaching-learning in geography. Tehran: Shora Publications.
Amir Teymouri, Mohammad Hassan, (2008). The teaching-learning media (identification, selection, production and application). Savalan Publications.
Yazdan Panah, Shahrzad, (2007). Comparing the effect of teaching by lecture and discussion method on the amount of learning and satisfaction of students. Iranian journal of education in medical sciences, sixth volume, No.52.
Fattahi Bafghi, Ali; Karimi, Hossein; Anvari, Mohammad Hossein and Barzegar, Kazem, (2008). Comparing the effect of teaching methods of lecture and team discussion on the learning amount of bachelor's degree students in laboratory sciences, journal of medical education development and studies center, 4(2): Pages.6-51.
Sorayya, Seyed Mehdi, (1999). The discussion method (according to study the mutual effectiveness and impressionability). Second edition, Tehran: Roshd Publications, 28(17), pages.52-60.
Shadpur, Kamel, (2008). The team discussion; a way for interference of student in learning. Journal of constant education in medical profession, first year, 2(6).
Malakouti, Mohammad, (2010). Teaching in the small groups (team discussion). Journal of teaching strategies, volume2, No.4, pages: 183-187.
Dixon, L. (2001). Evidence- based practices for services to families of people with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of social psychology. Vol. 71, pp. 302-312.
Kassop, M. (2003). Ten ways online education matches or surpasses face-to-face learning. Book of Edu cational.
Brandt, R. (2002). The challenge to public Education. Journal of Educational. New York: Routledge.
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (Ù¢Ù Ù Ù¤). Models of Teaching, Hemel Hempstead: Allyn & Bacon.
Richardson D. (2008). Don,t dump the didactic lecture; Fix it. ADV physiol Educ. 2008; (32): 23-4.
Catt, s. & miller, D. & Schallenkamp, k. (2007). You are the key: communicate for learning effectivenees, academic research library. 127, 3; http://findarticles.com/articles/mi_qa367/is_200704/ai_n19430527.
Edwards, D. Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. Published by Routledge, londin: Methuen. ISBN 0416398901, 9780416398908.
Parsh, D. (2007). Steps to a coaching philpsophy, Academic Research Library Coach and athletic Director: 76,9; 01-APR-07.
Storey C.(2002), Innovation in services. Aust Marketing J. 10(1):59-70.
Runco.(2007). Creativity, Reaserch, Development and Practice.Chapter 10, Enhancement and Fulfillment creativity, pp319-373.
Ward, T.B. (2007)Creative Cognition as a WindowonCreativity.Methods, 42.
Meyer, j.p. and Herscovitch, L. (2001), Commitment in the workplace, toward Ageneral model , Human resource management review, vol 11.