Resumen
Managers need the related information about costs to plan and achieve it. On the other hand, awareness about costs behavior by changes of the activity level or selling level are important information for managers”™ decision making about planning, budgeting, pricing products, determining of break even, and other managerial issues. The relationship between costs stickiness and stock price volatility and adjusting role of conservatism was studied in Tehran stock Exchange in this research. Statistical population and sample of this research includes 93 companies in seven years of 2009-2015. This research was applied based on its objective, and data collection method (research design) was descriptive. Hypotheses of this research were test using combined and rolling regression method. There is not a significant relationship between cost stickiness and stock price volatility based on research results, but there is a positive and significant relationship between cost stickiness in companies with high conservatism and stock price volatility.
Citas
Anderson, M. C, Banker R, Janakiraman S. Are Selling, General and Administrative Costs “Stickey”?. Journal of Accounting Reasearch 2003;41(1): 47-63.
Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim , Amr Nazieh Ezat . Sticky cost behavior: evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 2017. 16-34
Bahar moghadam, M., Kavoosi, M, “time asymmetry of conservatism and cost stickiness”. Accounting Knowledge, 2013. No. 15, 77-55.
Banker, R., Basu, S., Byzalov, D. and Chen, J. Asymmetries in Cost-Volume-Profit Relation: Cost Stickiness and Conditional conservatism. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2312179. 2013.
Esmailzadeh, A., Merhnooh, A. the relationship between costs stickiness and profit quality and prediction error, Financial Accounting Research and Audit, 2014. 37-61, 6 (21).
Ghasem bolu, M., Khanhosseini, D., Nikunesbati. M. Investigating the Relationship between management view and cost stickiness in Tehran Stock Exchange. Planning and Budgeting Schedule, 7th edition, 2012. No. 3, pp. 79-95.
Givoly, D. and Hayn, C. "and The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals: Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative", Journal Accounting and Economic, 2012. 29(3),pp.287-320.
Hashemi, S. A., Amiri, H., Nejati, A. “Cost stickiness theory on conditional conservatism and informational asymmetry” research and scientific journal of management accounting, 7th edition, 2014. No. 23, pp: 43-56
Homburg, C. and Nasev, J. "How Timely are Earnings when Costs are Sticky? Implications for the Link between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Stickiness", American Accounting Association. 2010.
Hutton, A.P., Marcus, A.J. and Tehranian, H. Opaque Financial Reports, R2 , and Crash Risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009. 94, 67-86.
Khodadadi, V., Nikkar, J., Hajizadeh, S. “the effect of cost stickiness and conditional conservatism on cost analysis, activity volume, and profit”, accounting advances in Shiraz University, 7th edition, 2015. No. 1, pp: 49-76
Nikkar, J., Hajizadeh, S. “Cost stickiness theory and its effects for accounting concepts. Accounting knowledge and research”, 10th edition, No. 39. 2014.
Por porato, M., & Werbin. "Active Cost Management in bank: Evidence of sticky costs in Argentina. Brazil and Canada. available at", http://ssrn.com/abstract=1659228. 2010.
Rajiv D. Banker, Sudipta Basu, Dmitri Byzalov, Janice Y.S. Chen. The confounding effect of cost stickness on conservatism estimates Journal of Accounting Economics, 61, (2016). pp, 203-220
Weiss D. "Cost behavior and analysts”™ earnings forecasts". The Accounting Review 2010; 85 (4): 1441 -1471 .
Yasukata, K., & Kajiwara, T. Are sticky costs the result of deliberate decision of managers? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/id=1444746. 2011.
Zanjirdar, M., Ghaffari Ashtiyani, P., Madahi, Z. analysis he effective factors on cost stickiness”, research and scientific Journal of management accounting, 7th edition, No. 20. 2014.