Resumen
This article represents and defines the concept and criteria for filling the category of "reasonableness" as a special valuation concept, widely used in the legislation on contract system in the Russian Federation and other countries, in particular the USA. Clarification of its essence is of great importance for the purpose of applying this legal category in lawmaking and law enforcement activities, first of all, to achieve maximum effectiveness of the operation of legal norms and observance of the principle of fair competition in concluding and executing contracts aimed at satisfying the public needs.
The general methodological basis was formed by the general scientific (dialectical) method of cognition, comparative, logical methods that allowed considering the problems of the development of civil legislation in the sphere of satisfying the state and municipal needs.
We presented and analyzed the theoretical studies of scientists in this field, as well as the latest judicial practice of Russia. We proposed to reform the current federal law of the Russian Federation on the contract system.
Referencias
Bogdanova E.E. 2014. Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Relations in Russian and Foreign Law // Actual Problems of Russian Law. No. 7. P. 1363 - 1369.
Belov V.A. 2015. The Concept of Conscientiousness and its Features in the Arbitration Process // Legislation and Economics. . No. 4. P. 42 - 46.
Chalfant D. 2016. Analyzing census data for an accurate analysis: How to ConductPrice Analysis for Services. // Contract Management. Feb Vol. 56(2). Pp. 40-44, 46.
Decision of the Ossetia OFAS of Russia dated May 19, 2015 on the Case No. A21-1-05/15 // Legal Reference System "ConsultantPlus".
Drabkin D.U. 2007. Federal government procurement: structure, process and current issues. Public Procurement: International Cases and Commentary. N.Y.
Fabey M. 2015. GAO: DOD Seeking Way To Determine Reasonable Prices // Aerospace Daily & Defense Report. Aug 19, Vol. 253(35). P. 3.
Gribanov D.V. 2015. Reasonableness as a Principle of Legal Regulation // Business, Management and Law. No. 1. P. 112 - 115.
Gordon D. I. 2012. Reflections On The Federal Procurement Landscape // Government Contractor. # 51. С. 3.
Hanjra A.R. 2012. Comparative best practices in public sector contracting - How the FAR excels in the socioeconomic perspective // Contract Management. Dec, Vol. 52(12). P. 34(10).
Lukyanenko M.F. 2010. Evaluation Concepts of Civil Law: Reasonableness, Conscientiousness, Materiality. М.: Statut,. 423 p.
Ponomarev V.V.1998. System of Public Procurement in the USA // Competitive Tender. No. 13. P. 35, 36.
Robinson K.D. U.S.2009. Federal Government Procurement: Organizational Structure, Process, and Current Issues // International Handbook of Public Procurement. New York.
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District dated June 17, 2015 No. F04-20562/2015 on the Case No. Ð46-11360/2014 // Legal Reference System "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District dated April 9, 2015 No. F06-22212/2013 on the Case No. Ð65-18409/2014 // Legal Reference System "ConsultantPlus".
The Standard of Procurement Activities of Certain Types of Legal Entities: Approved by the OFAS of Russia // Legal Reference System "ConsultantPlus".
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la lamisma licencia del original.