Theoretical aspects of collective Enterprises | Revista Publicando
Theoretical aspects of collective Enterprises
PDF (EN)

Cómo citar

Zhuk, S. I., Khabibullin, R. I., & Grigoreva, D. R. (2017). Theoretical aspects of collective Enterprises. Revista Publicando, 4(13 (3), 843-852. Recuperado a partir de https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/1009

Resumen

This article is devoted to the theoretical issues of the functioning of collective enterprises. The article reveals the concept of a collective enterprise (self-managed firm), as well as the principles of the functioning of such firms. The authors mean collective enterprises by those economic entities which work collective actively participates in making managerial decisions. Moreover, the organizational and legal form of the enterprise is immaterial for the case. The arguments of supporters and opponents of collective management are considered. The main advantage of such enterprises is the high level of motivation of employees interested in eventual outcomes of their work. It is shown that collective enterprises overcome such management problems as imbalance of interests for various participants of economic activity, authoritarianism at the microeconomic level, prevention of workers from participation in production management. At the same time, the main feature of a collective enterprise is not so much the participation of workers in the company's capital, but rather the real economic power of its work collective, what requires formation of a qualitatively different corporate governance culture aimed at broad involvement of employees in managerial and economic processes. The most important argument of opponents of collective enterprises is the ineffectiveness of making group decisions due to the lack of professional competencies among the bulk of ordinary workers. The paper notes that this deficiency is overcome by introducing the system of continuing education for members of the work collective at a collective enterprise. The condition for preserving the advantages of collective enterprises and eliminating their shortcomings is the strengthening of interaction of labor and capital in making decisions in the sphere of production management and the distribution of its results.

PDF (EN)

Citas

Alpatov A.A. 2016.The effective (anti-crisis) structure of the corporate ownership. Moscow: Yurlitinform, p. 216.

Belokrylova О.S., Ermishina Ð.V. 2012.Collective actions agencies (regarding housing self-organization model). // Terra Economicus, Vol. 10, No. 1. – p. 175-176.

Boltrukevich V.E., Vzorov V.N., Naumov A.I. 2014.Motivating Knowledge Management in Organization. // The Bulletin of Moscow University 24, Management, 1-2, p. 32.

Carr M.D., Mellizo P. 2013.The Relative Effect of Voice, Autonomy, and the Wage on Satisfaction with Work // International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 24, â„– 6.

Gunn C. 1986.Workers' Self-Management in the United States. Ithaca: London. Cornell University Press.

Handel M.J., Levine D.I. 2004.Editors` Introduction: The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers // Industrial relations, Vol. 43, No. 1.

Ignatskaya M.A. 2006. The new economy: the experience of structural-functional analysis. Moscow: KomKniga, p. 160.

Khabibullin R.I.2016. Collective enterprise model: the basic characteristics // Strategic Planning and Enterprise Development (Seventeenth All-Russian symposium materials) / ed. by Corr.-memb. Kleiner G.B. Section 1. Theoretical problems of strategic planning at the micro level. Moscow: CEMI, p. 152-153.

Khabibullin R.I., Zhuk S.I. 2017.Foreign collective entrepreneurship models: Lessons for Russia. // Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, Vol.78, No. 1.

Lalu F. 2016.Opening the organization of the future. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber.

Nekrasova О.V., Khabibullin R.I.2016. Collective enterprise and traditional company: comparative analysis of corporate cultures. Economic Revival of Russia, Vol. 47, No. 1.

Nekipelov A.D. 1996. Essays on the economics of post-communism. Moscow: CISN, p. 109.

Ohana M., Meyer M., Swaton S. 2013.Decision-Making in Social Enterprises: Exploring the Link between Employee Participation and Organizational Commitment // Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 42, No. 6.

Ostrom E. 2010.Managing general. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Moscow: IRISEN, Misl Publ., p. 176.

Presnyakov V.F.1991. Model behavior of the enterprise. Moscow: Nauka, p. 39.

Rasskazov S.V. 2013.Regularities of the corporate governance system and the implications for the organizational development of Russian companies. Moscow: Publishing House «Nauka », p. 132.

Roelants B., Dovgan D., Eum H., Terrasi E. 2012.The Resilience of the Cooperative Model: How Worker Cooperatives and Other Worker-Owned Enterprises Respond to the Crisis and its Consequences. CECOP-CICOPA Europe. . URL: http://www.cecop.coop/IMG/pdf/report_cecop_2012_en_web.pdf.

Toksanbaeva M.S. 2006.Social interests of workers and the use of labor potential. Moscow: Nauka.p. 125.

Vanek J. 1970.The General Theory of Labor-Managed Market Economies. Ithaca: London: Cornell University Press..

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.