Keywords
educación superior
conocimiento de la teorÃa de la argumentación
implementación de la teorÃa de la argumentación.
How to Cite
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como objetivo el análisis de los indicadores de participación femenina en el Emprendimiento en los países de América Latina. Como primera etapa de la investigación se desarrolló una búsqueda bibliográfica en Scopus con la palabra clave “entrepreneurship” y limitando este conjunto a aquellos artículos en que apareciera en las `palabras claves el término “Women”. y se obtuvieron un total de 86 artículos.
La segunda parte de la investigación consistió en el análisis de los indicadores reportados en el GEM (http://www.gemconsortium.org/). Se seleccionaron dos Indicadores: la Actividad emprendedora total en etapas tempranas (AET) o (TEA)y la relación Mujer / Hombre TEA impulsado por oportunidades.
Con los datos tomados del Monitor Global de Emprendimiento se realizó un análisis de clústeres para la razón Mujeres/Hombres (TEA) que permitió clasificar los países en cinco grupos. Un procesamiento similor en clústeres se realizó para la relación Mujer / Hombre TEA impulsado por oportunidades.
Se destacaron r tanto las diferencias entre los dos tipos de indicadores como la no concordancia de los grupos diferentes de países. El análisis realizado aunque de carácter exploratorio ilustró la posibilidad de analizar distintos grupos de países en relación con las diferencias que pueden motivar en las mujeres la realización del emprendimiento para ser independiente o aumentar sus ingresos, en lugar de simplemente mantener sus ingresos
References
Alonso, J. A. G., et al.González, Y. P. (2015). Análisis de las revistas latinoamericanas de acceso abierto. El caso ecuador. Revista Publicando, 2(2), 12-23.
Aramand, M. (2013). Women entrepreneurship in mongolia: The role of culture on entrepreneurial motivation. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 32(1), 68-82. doi: 10.1108/02610151311305623
Bosma, N. (2013). The global entrepreneurship monitor (gem) and its impact on entrepreneurship research. Foundations and Trends ® in Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 143-248.
Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., et al.Welter, F. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women's entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8-24. doi: 10.1108/17566260910942318
Chitsike, C. (2000). Culture as a barrier to rural women”™s entrepreneurship: Experience from zimbabwe. Gender and Development, 8(1), 71-77. doi: 10.1080/741923408
Elaine Allen, I., et al.Langowitz, N. S. (2011). Understanding the gender gap in entrepreneurship: A multicountry examination The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data.
Fuller-Love, N., Lim, L., et al.Akehurst, G. (2006). Guest editorial: Female and ethnic minority entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 429-439. doi: 10.1007/s11365-006-0007-y
Heilman, M. E., et al.Chen, J. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a solution: The allure of self-employment for women and minorities. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 347-364. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00021-4
Humbert, A. L., et al.Brindley, C. (2015). Challenging the concept of risk in relation to women”™s entrepreneurship. Gender in Management, 30(1), 2-25. doi: 10.1108/GM-10-2013-0120
Hurley, A. E. (1999). Incorporating feminist theories into sociological theories of entrepreneurship. Women in Management Review, 14(2), 54-62. doi: 10.1108/09649429910261396
Kelley, D., Singer, S., et al.Herrington, M. (2016). 2015/2016 global report. GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Tecnológico de Monterrey, International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Wellesley, MA.
Kraus-Harper, U. (1991). "Entrepreneurship development' for enterprising women? Small Enterprise Development, 2(1), 42-45.
Lasio, V., Caicedo, G., Ordeñana, X., et al.Villa, R. (2013). Global entrepreneurship monitor ecuador: Guayaquil: ESPAE-ESPOL.
Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., et al.Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The global entrepreneurship monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693-714.
Malach-Pines, A., et al.Schwartz, D. (2008). Now you see them, now you don't: Gender differences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(7), 811-832. doi: 10.1108/02683940810896358
Marlow, S., et al.McAdam, M. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate and challenging myths; exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(1), 114-124. doi: 10.1108/13552551311299288
Minniti, M. (2010). Female entrepreneurship and economic activity. European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 294-312. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2010.18
Minniti, M., et al.Naudé, W. (2010). What do we know about the patterns and determinants of female entrepreneurship across countries? European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 277-293. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2010.17
Orhan, M., et al.Scott, D. (2001). Why women enter into entrepreneurship: An explanatory model. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 232-247. doi: 10.1108/09649420110395719
Panta, S. K., et al.Thapa, B. (2017). Entrepreneurship and women's empowerment in gateway communities of bardia national park, nepal. Journal of Ecotourism, 1-23. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2017.1299743
Pettersson, K., Ahl, H., Berglund, K., et al.Tillmar, M. (2017). In the name of women? Feminist readings of policies for women's entrepreneurship in scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(1), 50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2017.01.002
Rapidminer. (2016). Rapidminer studio
Razmi, M. J., et al.Firoozabadi, S. R. (2016). Investigating the effect of education on women's entrepreneurship. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 13(2-3), 273-288. doi: 10.1504/IJLIC.2016.075693
Singh, G., et al.Belwal, R. (2008). Entrepreneurship and smes in ethiopia: Evaluating the role, prospects and problems faced by women in this emergent sector. Gender in Management, 23(2), 120-136. doi: 10.1108/17542410810858321
Sultan, S. S. (2016). Women entrepreneurship working in a conflict region: The case of palestine. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2-3), 149-156. doi: 10.1504/WREMSD.2016.074970
Sullivan, D. M., et al.Meek, W. R. (2012). Gender and entrepreneurship: A review and process model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 428-458. doi: 10.1108/02683941211235373
Tanusia, A., Marthandan, G., et al.Subramaniam, I. D. (2016). Economic empowerment of malaysian women through entrepreneurship: Barriers and enablers. Asian Social Science, 12(6), 81-94. doi: 10.5539/ass.v12n6p81
Todorović, I., Komazec, S., Jevtić, M., Obradović, V., et al.Marić, M. (2016). Strategic management in development of youth and women entrepreneurship - case of serbia. Organizacija, 49(4), 197-207. doi: 10.1515/orga-2016-0018
Treanor, L. (2012). Entrepreneurship education: Exploring the gender dimension: A gender and enterprise network, hea sponsored, discussion workshop. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 206-210. doi: 10.1108/17566261211234689
Warnecke, T. (2014). Are we fostering opportunity entrepreneurship for women? Exploring policies and programmes in china and india. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(2-3), 154-181. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2014.062880
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.