Palabras clave
Lok Adalat
citizenship of justice
alternative dispute resolution methods Panchayat
ciudadanización de la justicia
métodos alternos de solución de controversias
Lok Adalat
Cómo citar
Resumen
En este artículo se analiza el estado de la justicia en República de la India, exponiéndose la acogida en el país de la regulación normativa de procedimientos de métodos alternos de solución de controversias; un sistema empleado en esta nación asiática como elemento garante de estabilidad social, a partir de instituciones genuinas del mismo, el Panchayat y el Lok Adalat, explicando como operan estas políticas de justicia ciudadana.
Citas
Banco Mundial. (2020). Doing Business 2020. Obtenido de Banco Mundial: https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/es/data/exploretopics/enforcing-contracts
Canakya, K. (2004). Textos del Arthashastra. Revista Derecho del Estado(17), 101-157.
Chen, A. H. (2014). The achievement of constitutionalism in Asia. En A. Chen, Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (págs. 1-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CIA. (5 de octubre de 2020). India. Obtenido de Central Intelligence Agency: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html
Commissioner, Office of the Register General & Census. (2011). Administrative Divisions. Obtenido de Office of the Register General & Census Commissioner: https://censusindia.gov.in/census_and_you/administrative_division.aspx
Dambuyant, M. (2004). El Arthashastra de Kautiya, tratado político de la India antigua. RevistaDerecho del Estado(17), 5-34.
Deva, S. (2014). The Indian constitution in the twenty-first century. En A. Chen, Constitutionalism in Asia in the early twenty-first century (págs. 343-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
eCommittee Supreme Court of India. (2020). Court Management and Case management System. Obtenido de eCommittee Supreme Court of India: https://ecourts.gov.in/ecourts_home/
Embree, A. T., & Wilhem, F. (1984). Historia de la India. España: Siglo XXI.
Gandhi, M. (2006). Sobre el hinduismo. Madrid: Siruela.
García Vázquez, B. (2021). Vademécum de derecho internacional público. Ciudad de México: Tirant Lo Blanch.
GarcíaVázquez, B. (2020). La justicia restaurativa como mecanismo de cierre del centrode detenciones de Guantánamo. Carta Económica Regional(2), 183-198.
Gazette of India. (1908). Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Obtenido de Digital Repository of All Central and State Acts: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2191?sam_handle=123456789/1362
George, K. (1992). Modern Indian Literature: an anthology. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.
Glenn, H. P. (2010). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gumber, D., Gautam, A., Dhiman, D., Singh, S., & Singh Bist, A. (2014). E-Panchayat. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & ResearchTechnology, 3(3).
Huntington, S. P. (2019). El choque de civilizaciones. Ciudad de México: Paidós.
India Government. (2020). The Constitution of India. Obtenido de India Government: https://www.india.gov.in/sites/upload_files/npi/files/coi_part_full.pdf
Indian Council of Arbitration. (2021a). About us. Obtenido de Indian Council of Arbitration: http://www.icaindia.co.in/htm/about-us.html
Indian Council of Arbitration. (1 de abril de 2021b). Arbitrators. Obtenido de Indian Council of Arbitration: http://www.icaindia.co.in/htm/arbitrators.htm
Indian Institute of Arbitration & Mediation. (2021). About IIAM. Obtenido de Indian Institute of Arbitration & Mediation: https://www.arbitrationindia.com/about_us.html
International Chamber of Commerce. (2021). Court Members. Obtenido de International Chamber of Commerce: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/icc-international-court-arbitration/court-members/#1478195489936-1a1acd15-7f6d
Jaffe, J. (2015). The ironies of colonial governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kadir, J. (2019). The utility of Traditional Justice System of Panchayat in ResolvingPakistan-India Interstate Conflict. Journal of Living Togheter, 6(1), 133-142.
Kissinger, H. (2016). Orden Mundial. México: Penguin Random House.
Le Clercq Ortega, J. A., & Rodríguez Sánchez Lara, G. (2020). ÍndiceGlobal de Impunidad 2020. Puebla: Universidad de las Américas Puebla. Obtenido de https://www.udlap.mx/cesij/files/indices-globales/0-IGI-2020-UDLAP.pdf
NALSA. (2019). Annual Report 2018. Delhi: NALSA. Obtenido de https://nalsa.gov.in/library/annual-reports/annual-report-2018
NALSA. (2020). Annual Report 2019. Delhi: NALSA. Obtenido de https://nalsa.gov.in/library/annual-reports/annual-report-2019
National Judicial Data Grid. (2020). Court Judge Count Report. Obtenido de National Judicial Data Grid: https://njdg.ecourts.gov.in/njdgnew/?p=disposed_dashboard/info_mang
National Legal Services Authority. (2009). National Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalat) Regulations, 2009. New Delhi: National Legal Services Authority. Obtenido de https://nalsa.gov.in/acts-rules/regulations/national-legal-services-authority-lok-adalat-regulations-2009
National Legal Services Authority. (2020). Handbook of formats: ensuring effective legalservices. Delhi: NALSA.
National Legal Services Authority. (2020). Legal Services, 2020. Obtenido de National Legal Services Authority: https://nalsa.gov.in/services/legal-aid/legal-services
National Legal Services Authority. (2020). Permanent Lok Adalat, April 2018 toMarch 2019. Obtenido de National Legal Services Authority: https://nalsa.gov.in/statistics/permanent-lok-adalat-april-2018-to-march-2019
National Legal Services Authority. (2021). Lok Adalat. Obtenido de National Legal Services Authority: https://nalsa.gov.in/services/lok-adalat
OXFAM India. (2015). 10 facts on illiteracy in India that you must know. Obtenido de OXFAM India: https://www.oxfamindia.org/featuredstories/10-facts-illiteracy-india-you-must-know#:~:text=India%20is%20home%20to%20the,illiterate%20adults%20in%20the%20world.&text=India's%20literacy%20rate%20has%20increased,largest%20population%20of%20illiterate%20adult
Pannikar, R. (2011). Espiritualidad hindú. Barcelona: Kairós.
Parliament of India. (1987). The Legal Services Authorities Act. Obtenido de National Legal Services Authority: https://nalsa.gov.in/acts-rules/the-legal-services-authorities-act-1987
Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2021). Recursos. Obtenido de Permanent Court of Arbitration: https://pca-cpa.org/es/resources/instruments-referring-to-the-pca/
Petech, L. (2004). Contexto geopolítico del Arthashastra. Revista Derecho delEstado(17), 71-78.
Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority. (2003). The Permanent Lok Adalat (Other terms and conditions appointment ofChairman and other persons) Rules, 2003. Obtenido de http://rlsa.gov.in/images/letters-circulars/rules_2003.pdf
Ravindra, G. (2018). India: Panchayats Mediation and Lok Adalat People´s CourtConciliation, and the Institutionalization of ADR. En S. P. Stobbe, ConflictResolution in Asia (págs. 219-250). London: Lexington Books.
Sánchez García, A., & García Vázquez, B. (2020). Los mecanismo de justicia alternativos como política de justicia cotidiana ante el conflicto por el uso del agua en México y su potencial aplicaicón en el Perú. Vox Iuris, 129-151.
Sharan, M. K. (1978). Court procedure in Ancient India. Delhi: AbhinavPublications.
Sharma, K. (2013). Social Stratification and Change in Contemporary India. En L. Peilin, M. Gorshkov, C. Scalon, & K. Sharma, Handbook on SocialStratification in the BRIC countries (págs. 37-58). Singapore: World Scientific.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre. (2021). SIAC Panel. Obtenido de Singapore International Arbitration Centre: https://www.siac.org.sg/our-arbitrators/siac-panel
Singh, U. (2009). Decentralized Democratic Governance in New Millenium. New Delhi: Ashok Kumar Mittal.
Supreme Court of India. (2019). Mediation Training Manual of India. Obtenido de Supreme Court of India: https://main.sci.gov.in/pdf/mediation/MT%20MANUAL%20OF%20INDIA.pdf
The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2021). India. Obtenido de The Observatory of Economic Complexity: https://oec.world/en/profile/country/ind
The World Bank. (2020). India Poverty and Equity Brief. Obtenido de The World Bank: https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/poverty/987B9C90-CB9F-4D93-AE8C-750588BF00QA/AM2020/Global_POVEQ_IND.pdf
The World Bank. (2021). World Bank Open Data. Obtenido de The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/
Thilagaraj, R. (2017). Nyaya Panchayat. En R. Thilagaraj, & J. Liu, Restorative Justicein India (págs. 3-12). Springer.
Vidyarthi, A. (2 de agosto de 2020). Revisiting India’s Position to Not Join the ICSID Convention. Obtenido de Kluwer Arbitration Blog: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/08/02/revisiting-indias-position-to-not-join-the-icsid-convention/
Wike, R., & Simmons, K. (2015). Global support for Principle of Free Expression,but Opposition to Some Forms of Speech. Obtenido de Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Democracy-Report-FINAL-November-18-2015.pdf
World Bank Group. (2020). Economic profile India. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Obtenido de https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/i/india/IND.pdf
World Bank Group. (2020b). Economy Profile México Doing Business 2020. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Obtenido de https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/m/mexico/MEX.pdf
World Bank Group. (2020c). Economy Profile India Doing Business 2020. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Obtenido de https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/i/india/IND.pdf
World Justice Project. (2020). Índice de Estado de Derecho. Washington, D.C.: World Justice Project. Obtenido de https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-Global-ROLI-Spanish.pdf
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2022 Borja García Vázquez