The production of meaning as a phenomenon of representation and attitude towards an era | Revista Publicando
The production of meaning as a phenomenon of representation and attitude towards an era
revista publicando
PDF (ES)

Keywords

phenomenology
hermeneutics
subject
meaning sentido
fenomenología
hermenéutica
sujeto

How to Cite

Díaz Perojo, R. L. (2024). The production of meaning as a phenomenon of representation and attitude towards an era. Revista Publicando, 11(43), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.51528/rp.vol11.id2417

Abstract

The issue of the production of meaning has entered the contemporary philosophical debate as a matter of new affiliations and a fervent commitment to practical philosophy. Not least, the production of meaning stands as the sojourn in which language renews the essentials of being and thought. However, the place of the production of meaning as a signifying practice for an interpretation/opening of the world has been confined to a moment of immobilization. From this point of view, the proposal to restore/redeem the production of meaning and make it viable as a phenomenon of representation and attitude; while proposing a solution, determines the internal restructuring of the historical-cultural, relocating the spaces of sign and symbol. Hence, phenomenology and hermeneutics have been inserted by contemporaneity as a generic point for the very reading of urgent daily issues. This image is inserted in a particular concrete situation, that is, at the very moment when the experience of language as a real practice of thought converges the question of text with the question of meaning. In this way, the subject in process documents its internal dynamics, while correcting its limits in the narrative of the contemporary world. Therefore, it is a hermeneutic of culture.

https://doi.org/10.51528/rp.vol11.id2417
PDF (ES)

References

Gadamer, H.-G. (2003). Verdad y método I .Salamanca, Ediciones Sígueme.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2016). El movimiento fenomenológico. Madrid. Editorial Síntesis.

Giddens, A. (1994). El Capitalismo y la moderna Teoría Social. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.

Grondin, J. (1999). Introducción a la Hermenéutica. Barcelona: Editorial Herder.

Iván Trujillo, P. M. (2009). El sujeto interrumpido. Chile: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.

Jameson, F. (2004). Una modernidad singular. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.

Kristeva, J. (1972). El sujeto en proceso. Colombia: Ediciones Signo.

Lara, F. d. (2011). Entre Fenomenología y Hermenéutica. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores.

Magda, R. M. (2004). Transmodernidad. Barcelona: Editorial Anthropos.

Maria Luz y Pintos Peñaranda, J. L. (1998). Fenomenología y Ciencia Humanas. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Martínez, A. M. (2004). Interpretar en Filosofía. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas.

Mena, P., Trujillo, I., & Muñoz, E. (2009). El sujeto interrumpido. Chile: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.

Nancy, J.-L. (1993). El sentido del mundo. París: Editions Galilée.

Reggiori, D. (1983). La producción de sentido:¿práctica filosófica o práctica del lenguaje? Ideas y valores, 59-79.

Sacristán, M. (2009). La tarea de Engels en el Anti-Düring. In M. Sacristán, Sobre Dialéctica. Barcelona: El viejo topo.

Schütz, A. (1993). La construcción significativa del mundo social . Barcelona: 1993.

Theunissen, M. (2013). El otro: estudios sobre la ontología social contemporánea. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Varios (1973). Mito y hermenéutica. Buenos Aires: Publicaciones El Escudo.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Roberto Luis Díaz Perojo

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.